MAGLATRON
Member level 2
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2024
- Messages
- 52
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 2
- Trophy points
- 8
- Location
- England
- Activity points
- 195
The datasheet is rather clear in this. There is a chart (several) which shows V_IH and V_IL vs VDD.does VDD in the IR2110 circuit at 5volt, then does the signal have to be the same
so could you please provide a more in depth explanation does the shifter provide the voltage for both the +5volt - VDD and the +3.3volt for the signals do I still use the Arduino with this setup could you do a mock-up in LTspice for meHi,
some points:
1) if the supply of the logic chip (that generates the signal) is 3.3V ... then the signal itself will always be less!
2) to me it seems the V_IH for 5.0V supply is about 3.5V according the diagram. Mind: vertical it´s 3V/div
3) if your weigth is 80kg ... and you go on a bungee jump ... and they say the maximum the rope can handle is 80kg .... would you do the jump?
Some hobbyists may have no problem with it...
But for me - as a designer for reliable industrial electronics - this is an absolute no go.
One has to consider that the supply voltage (3.3V) will have initial tolerance, thermal drift and drift with load. So in worst case it may be 15% to 20% less than nominal.
And also the supply voltage (5V) and the thresholds of the IR2110 will drift (to more positive in worst case)
If you get 3.3V (nominal supply voltage) signals and you want to feed the IR2110 (5V supplied) .... I recommend to use an 74HCTxxx logic device (supplied with 5V) as level shifter.
Klaus
as I said model of Arduino I have a few and not forced to use any pretty much forced to use the IR2110 and the power is not forced but it does run the main circuitry from 12v hope this is clear the reason 3.3 is in my head is because it says in the datasheet that it runs on 3.3v logic does the vdd logic supply have to be the same voltage as on the signal pins???? that is what I need to clarify please, thanks. Never used a level shifter but think it might not be a necessity "output levels that satisfy the IR2110 requirements" what are those requirements in idiot proof terms if you can* What exact ARDUNIO are you using? What is it´s power supply, what are it´s signal levels.
* Are you forced to use this exact Arduino module?
* Are you forced to use the IR2110?
* Are you forced to use the IR2110 powered with 5V?
I wonder where this come from. Did you read the datasheet?I just thought that if the VDD needs 5volt
No. The chart shows the threshold level. And this threshold level has a tolarance and has drift.then the maximum voltage needed at the signal is 3.3v
Already answered .. multiple times...does the vdd logic supply have to be the same voltage as on the signal pins????
I already explained it before, now again. The datashett explains it, too. I don´t understand what´s still unclear. I guess I´m unable to explain .. then you need to contact some one else.Never used a level shifter but think it might not be a necessity "output levels that satisfy the IR2110 requirements" what are those requirements in idiot proof terms if you can
what exactly are the requirementssatisfy the IR2110 requirements
I choose the 5v Arduino --> IR21105V Arduino --> 5V IR2110
Indeed the whole datasheet.what exactly are the requirements
I´ve not designed 5V microcontroller appplication in decades. Thus I surely would go for 3.3VI choose the 5v Arduino --> IR2110
I know you said you cannot tell me which is best but in your opinion how would you go about it, it would be highly appreciated!!
did you modify it according decoupling capacitors, power supplies, signal supplies?so is this good?
For me speaking ... 8 AA batteries is not the same as 12V.power supply will be 8 AA batteries combined for 12volt
Duracell AA batteries 1.5v each adds up to 12vFor me speaking ... 8 AA batteries is not the same as 12V.
This is because when I hear 12V, then I assume this is "really" 12.0V from a stable supply.
But 8 AA batteries may be rechargable ones or not.
And batteries have a higher range of voltage
and batteries have a higher impedance
and a different behaviour with respect to frequency.
Additionally batteries should be operated with some kind of protection.
Under-discharge ... overcurrent ... over charge ...
For some applications this all may not play a big role ... but for other applications this may result in malfunction.
***
I don´t know whether this plays a role for your load... but in any case you should add low ESR bulk capacitor on your PCB (in parallel to the already mentioned fast capacitors)
Klaus
I guess the main reason is because I´ve learned to read datasheets and according application notes.why don't you use spice???
Again: this 1.5V is just nominal battery voltage. In realit the voltage may be higher when very new ... but the voltage will drop:Duracell AA batteries 1.5v each adds up to 12v
fancy designing me a PCB?? with the proper component positioning and placement I would appreciate it! and I know about power spikes and FET's if you look at the circuit you will know that there is protection for that as wellI guess the main reason is because I´ve learned to read datasheets and according application notes.
Thes documents telly you how you should do the schematic.
But the schematic is only half the way to success.
With almost all modern circuits you need an appropriate PCB layout. Here the LTspice is not of help at all. (There are more advanced simulation tools that take the PCB layout into account)
Let´s take your circuit.
I follow the requirements about signal levels, power supply, timing ... thus I am quite sure the circuit should work.
I don´t need the simulation... because the simulation uses the information from the datasheet (in most cases).
So if the datasheet is wrong ... the simulation will be wrong, too.
But if the datasheet is correct .. there still is the chance that the simulation is wrong.
Thus I trust the datsheet more than the simulation.
And I´m experienced with PCB routing.
I don´t think that in the past 10 years I had a design that did not work from the beginning.
Now the other way round.
You do the simulation .. nothing wrong with it. But you don´t see that a device becomes warm. You don´t see the negative effects of a bad PCB layout.
You don´t see the effects of a missing power supply decoupling capacitor. You (usually) don´t see when an XTAL circuit does not oscillate (or oscillates with the worng frequency).
So the simulation gives good results .... but then on a bad PCB layout .... or missing capacitors ... it´s likely that the circuit explodes.
Or especially with (your) switching power application ... yu are not aware of very short voltage spikes when a transistor switches OFF.
And it may work fine .. .maby for weeks ... but the spikes may slowly kill the IC inside isolation barrier .. and you see your circuit fail after weeks or month of (apparently) working fine.
This does not mean simulation is a bad thing. Nor do I want somebody discourage from using simulation.
They bring a big benefit - especially for less experienced designers. Or if the designer eneters a new field of electronics.
One can play around, test this and that .. see the influence. And for all this you don´t need to buy all the ICs and other parts ... and you don´t see an semiconductor to explode.
Klaus
--- Updated ---
Again: this 1.5V is just nominal battery voltage. In realit the voltage may be higher when very new ... but the voltage will drop:
* with rising load current
* with change of temperture
* with age
* with charging state
Sooner or later they will go down to 0V.
Maybe they work satisfactory down to 1.2V ... but after this they gow down very fast.
And if you continue to draw current .. they may even leak out an etchy fluid.
Klaus
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?