usu4rio
Newbie level 6
Re: Antenna design tools
Hi,
My experience:
NEC (http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/swindex.html)
Altough NEC4 is not freely avaliable, there are several free versions for NEC2. For windows 4nec2 is quite good, but for those who want to play with de code there's also a C version of NEC (known as nec2c. Unfortunatly the ouput is not compatible with Fortran versions, and cannot be used with, for example, 4nec2). As long as I'm concerned is the only one not written in Fortran.
Is simple, but I has no support for dielectric. It's intendeed for vertical antennas over an (im)perfect ground. For planar antennas over a dielectric it has no support at all (I hope not).
There are also commercial version, usually NEC2 (I think only GNEC uses NEC4), like SuperNEC that works "with" Matlab. Anyway, there are not many differences between simulators, and these commercial versions only add a good GUI
EMAP5 (**broken link removed**)
Much more powerfull than NEC2, but also slower. It can model patches over a dielectric. It's easier to write input files, as is fully written in C, and dosen't need fortran-like "cards"
MOMENTUM (Agilent)
It's commercial, and 2.5D, but as a first approch to model planar antennas i think it's quite good. I like its layout editor.
I'm trying to optimaze the input impedance a planar antenna, therefore I'm looking for a "fast" simulator, no need of accurracy (I can used Momentum or HFSS for the prototype). NEC2 was my choice (EMAP5 is quite slow), but I have no idea how can I solve the dielectric problem: I've been thinking of an lossy ground at a certain distance that could model the dielectric efect.
Any ideas?
usu4rio
p.s. Element7k thank's for Mstrip40. I'll give it a try
Hi,
My experience:
NEC (http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/swindex.html)
Altough NEC4 is not freely avaliable, there are several free versions for NEC2. For windows 4nec2 is quite good, but for those who want to play with de code there's also a C version of NEC (known as nec2c. Unfortunatly the ouput is not compatible with Fortran versions, and cannot be used with, for example, 4nec2). As long as I'm concerned is the only one not written in Fortran.
Is simple, but I has no support for dielectric. It's intendeed for vertical antennas over an (im)perfect ground. For planar antennas over a dielectric it has no support at all (I hope not).
There are also commercial version, usually NEC2 (I think only GNEC uses NEC4), like SuperNEC that works "with" Matlab. Anyway, there are not many differences between simulators, and these commercial versions only add a good GUI
EMAP5 (**broken link removed**)
Much more powerfull than NEC2, but also slower. It can model patches over a dielectric. It's easier to write input files, as is fully written in C, and dosen't need fortran-like "cards"
MOMENTUM (Agilent)
It's commercial, and 2.5D, but as a first approch to model planar antennas i think it's quite good. I like its layout editor.
I'm trying to optimaze the input impedance a planar antenna, therefore I'm looking for a "fast" simulator, no need of accurracy (I can used Momentum or HFSS for the prototype). NEC2 was my choice (EMAP5 is quite slow), but I have no idea how can I solve the dielectric problem: I've been thinking of an lossy ground at a certain distance that could model the dielectric efect.
Any ideas?
usu4rio
p.s. Element7k thank's for Mstrip40. I'll give it a try