Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Verification of analog designs

Status
Not open for further replies.

chviswanadh

Member level 5
Member level 5
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
93
Helped
21
Reputation
42
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Bangalore
Activity points
1,792
Hello,

Is it right way to verify analog designs at varous PVT and design corners?

Eventhough the specifications are verified at simulation stage(at PVT corners) is it going to ensure an error free design on silicon.

If it is not can some body give me the right way to verify the designs

Are these results going to be simulator dependant??


Please give me some inputs on this.


Thanks
chvswanadh
 

Hi,
Verification mainly deals with corner verification.
However it is the job of Verification engineer to find the loop holes in the circuit even if the circuit is passing all the process corners.

If you want to verify your circuit more conservatively then go for Monte Carlo analysis with variation in FOX and TOX thickness , and some other variations.

If your circuit is passing Monte Carlo analysis then you can be rest assured that if there is any failure of circuit thats due to FAB limitation.

Thanks
sarfraz
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
verification will deal with the different combination of the PVT.
 

Hello Piao,

Thanks for your reply. I know that verification is done at combination of PVT corners. My question was is it going to make sure an error free design on silicon.


To Shaik Sarfraz,

Thanks for the reply. I can understand your point but what do you mean to say loop holes. To give more clarity on my question, I was talking about the pre layout verification.

Thanks
chviswanadh
 

Hi,
For pre layout verification to make your design error free, the only thing I can suggest is to take into consideration the parasictic and routing capacitance. This will help in knowing the performance of the system when it will be drive some other load.

thanks
sarfraz
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hello Sarfraz,

How can we estimate the parasitics of routing?

because at the simulation stage we dont know how much of these parasitics come into picture after layout.

Thanks
chviswanadh
 

chviswanadh said:
Hello,

Is it right way to verify analog designs at varous PVT and design corners?

Eventhough the specifications are verified at simulation stage(at PVT corners) is it going to ensure an error free design on silicon.

If it is not can some body give me the right way to verify the designs

Are these results going to be simulator dependant??


Please give me some inputs on this.


Thanks
chvswanadh

Except for the PVT corners verifications, the statisical mismatch analysis is key part for the sucess for the deisgn. We always pass it with all PVT corners and guranteed it meet the spec in WCS.Then the mismatch analysis will be done to investiagate the robustness for the design vs. the sattiscal mismatchings.

After the pre-sim designs, we need to verify it in post-simulations. The package parasitics is alos counted into the design. For the mixed design, it is more complicated for the noise considerations, it is selodom can be modeld in design.

Then, we also need to check the layout carefully to investigate the potetional risks for the EOS(electrical over stress) and EMI etc...Even it passed the DRC ruls, this investigations is also necessary for long term reliability.


So,the specifications are verified at simulation stage(at PVT corners) is just one of the key parts to ensure an error free design on silicon.

Thanks
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
hello chang830,

Thanks for the reply.
I didn't understand couple of things in your reply. What do you mean by statistical analysis. Secondly what is WCS.

You said we need to consider circuit parasitics after post simulation. Is there a way to estimate the paracitics.

Thanks
chviswanadh
 

chviswanadh said:
hello chang830,

Thanks for the reply.
I didn't understand couple of things in your reply. What do you mean by statistical analysis. Secondly what is WCS.

You said we need to consider circuit parasitics after post simulation. Is there a way to estimate the paracitics.

Thanks
chviswanadh

In normally, we did not do the Monte Carlo analysis for the design. We ask the design meet the spec at WCS, here WCS is the worst condition case, i.e. the worst one for the combined PVT cases. The statisical analysis is always for the mismatch analysis, e.g., you can perform the Monte Carlo analysis to investiagte the sensitivity of the design versus the mismatch.

About the parasitics, the RC extarction can give you the parasitics value and you can use the post-lyaout netlist for the simulation. As for the estimate of the parasitics in pre-sim, you can try to add some caps in the interesting nodes in pre-sim, which can give you a quick verification for your design. Another one is if your design is based on a previous one which assume has a good design report/memo containing the compliance data for the pre-sim and post-sim. You can refer it in the design phase.
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hi,
As you have asked that how to calculate the routing capacitance while designing the Schematic.

This things are learnt with experience. You can take a worst case routing capacitance and simulate using this value.

thanks
sarfraz
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hello Chang,

Thanks for the information that is really useful.

Now I have an issue finding the stability of a switching regulator.

If you have an idea abt this please let me know how to perform the stability analysis.

Thanks
chviswanadh
 

chviswanadh said:
Hello Chang,

Thanks for the information that is really useful.

Now I have an issue finding the stability of a switching regulator.

If you have an idea abt this please let me know how to perform the stability analysis.

Thanks
chviswanadh

It is a bit compliticated about the stability analysis for the switching regulator.The coventional small signal loop analysis is not easily appliied to switching regulator.

I remembered I ever part in a design review on the siwtching regulator in a large semiconductor corporation. The designer used the transient analysis to check the stability. You can try to use the step response to assess the stabilty.

Hope it helps.
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hello chang,

I have a doubt here. Transient is done over a period of time where the input stimulus is time varying. But the small signal analysis is done at steady state.

So how can you find the operating point through the transient and even stability?

Regards
chviswanadh
 

hi,
I donnot know whether transient analysis can be done to find the stability.
Transient analysis is a large signal analysis. The operating points are found by the biasing that is provided for the circuit.

thanks
sarfraz
 

    chviswanadh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top