Yes, FvM, the redundancy is in 2 of the possible 'states' of the 3 relays, not in components in the circuit.
Nothing has to be eliminated, but the relay controller must be designed so that the 6 useful 'states' are possible outputs (and 2 'states' will never be used).
Surly another supply for reference.
Malik, if the task is in synchronising a generating set with a remote mains supply, then I wish you had told us that is the task before now, because there are other issues to consider in building synchronising equipment.
The relays must be capable of carrying full-load line-line fault currents.
There must be a visual indication of phase error ideally with a resolution down to 1%.
There must be a visual indication of phase sequence (ie the direction. Only 2 possible directions apply, as discussed to death in this thread).
It is prefered to have displays of frequency on both supplies.
There must be a means of adjusting the speed (frequency) of the local supply. (This can be done manually or automatically, and it might make the relay switching unnecessary)
There must be fail-safe interlock to ensure that phases cannot be connected without proving a neutral connection, and, all of the phases will be dis-connected if ever any one phase becomes dis-connected.
It is preferred to have another interlock that prevents phases being connected while the frequency is out of tolerance or either supply is over voltage thresholds.
There must always be a means of manual isolation of the local equipment which is capable of full-load line-line fault currents.
And the over-current protection for the entire system must be designed to protect every component of the system, including seizure of the turbine, stuck relay/contactor, and every permutation of short circuit; without this protection the risk of fire will always be high.
I hope this helps.
But if its NOT a project to synchronise 2 supplies then please explain what actual work you are attempting to do with the 3 relays.