The LT1028 was designed to maximize BW open loop at the expense of phase margin and has not been optimized for phase margin.
From datasheet "The LT®1028(gain of –1 stable)/LT1128(gain of +1 stable)"
The non-inverting input is better if the source impedance is not 0 and will be better to reduce the negative feedback overshoot. Thus the phase margin is improved by increasing risetime (slightly) for any Rs source.Then we have :
View attachment 187663
So phase margin definitely a cliff hanger, but then Cload curve they snuck in
some G rolloff in test circuit.
Then we have this (thanks ADI for a "guess what to do with this pin" approach) :
LT1028 or LT1128 - LTspice models with Compensation Pin? - Q&A - Operational Amplifiers - EngineerZone
Are there any LTspice models for the LT1028 or LT1128 that have the compensation pin? Or is there any other way to simulate this? Maybe there is a parameter thatez.analog.com
Regards, Dana.
Thanks AG but I did it intentionally to show the logic of avoiding a large feedback loop for whatever reasons like avoiding parasitic coupling to the positive feedback Vin+ in the layout.Your schematic had many jogs in its wiring (caused by Multisim?) and it had its parts very far apart making it huge.
I fixed it:
the problem is that you ignore how an inductance works.When i ran the simulation i get this current threw a coil far from the expected rectangular shape.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?