Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Is it ok to place AT89S52 microcontroller very close to the stepdown transformer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hiroshi_S

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Feb 19, 2015
Messages
18
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
3
Activity points
171
hi,
My PCB size is compact and so i am placing the microcontroller AT89S52 near the transformer, I am worried about its working. I want to know will this design will disrupt the normal working of the microcontroller? Kindly give your valuable feedback.
 

Can you share with us your PCB design image?
Here I have provided the sample placement
sample layout.png
sample.png
 
Last edited:

What kind of transformer is it? A PCB mount flyback transformer(SMPS transformer)? Size? Distance between the transformer and your microcontroller?
 

What kind of transformer is it? A PCB mount flyback transformer(SMPS transformer)? Size? Distance between the transformer and your microcontroller?
Its PCB mount metallic core single phase transformer of 200mA stepped down to 18V, its size is 22x38 and, its distance between uC and transformer is hardly 3mm. and there are relays too in the design.
 

Hi,

The problem I see is not the transformer, but the PCB is not made according EMI/EMC and ESD standards.

Nowadays circuits are used nearby HF sources like cellular phones, WiFi, Bluetooth...thus - because of lack of a GND plane - all traces will act as transmitting and receiving antennas.
Then there is a connector where directly microcontroller signals are wired to. I see no ESD protection nor HF filters.

Let's imagine the transformer as a car with thieves (HF noise) close to your house. But your PCB (house) circuit is an "invitation" for thieves with open doors (no protection).

Klaus

Btw: since decades computers usually have a "screenshot button" no need to take photos with bad quality and big file size.
 
Hi,

The problem I see is not the transformer, but the PCB is not made according EMI/EMC and ESD standards.

Nowadays circuits are used nearby HF sources like cellular phones, WiFi, Bluetooth...thus - because of lack of a GND plane - all traces will act as transmitting and receiving antennas.
Then there is a connector where directly microcontroller signals are wired to. I see no ESD protection nor HF filters.

Let's imagine the transformer as a car with thieves (HF noise) close to your house. But your PCB (house) circuit is an "invitation" for thieves with open doors (no protection).

Klaus

Btw: since decades computers usually have a "screenshot button" no need to take photos with bad quality and big file size.
Thanks, Klaus... well, I will consider your views. once it's done, I will send the proper screenshots.
Thanks lot.
 

Distance between mains transformer and uC is no particular problem. I expect disturbed processor operation caused by relays arcing. Also noise coupled through transformer winding capacitance to the processor circuit might be a problem. Poor ground wiring and insufficient 5V bypassing allow inferences to pass to the processor and e.g. cause unintended resets.
 
You do not show schem...if you show it, more advice can flow to you.Your is a mains transformer so its a bit noisy with the rectifier switching etc, but not as bad as a smps transformer.
Incidentally, attached is PCB layout notes.
Basically.
Keep current loops as narrow in area as possible.
Dont run switching power currents along lengths of control ground otherwise you get ground bounce and the ground varies in potential and processors may get upset.
Keep switching nodes (high dv/dt) as small as possible......or shield them with ground copper or DC rail copper
--- Updated ---

And i will finish off with a question for you. Why should PCB track current loops be kept as small in area as possible? Especially current loops which involve connections to sensitive inputs or processors etc.
Remember a current loop can be through a capacitor in places.
 

Attachments

  • Basics of SMPS Layout _4.zip
    543.1 KB · Views: 72

    MD_SHAHRUKH

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

    Hiroshi_S

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top