Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

hysteresis of 74HC04

Status
Not open for further replies.

azadfalah

Full Member level 2
Full Member level 2
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
145
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,425
hi friends,

Is the difference or gap between these two voltages specified in the image below , the same as hysteresis?
if not, then what is the hysteresis voltage of 74HC04 ? and what is the voltage between the two specified voltages?

74HC04_hysteresis.JPG



Thanks
 

Solution
hi,

By using IC 74HC14, the problem of multiple interrupts was solved, and in normal mode, multiple interrupts do not occur.


In a noisy environment, an interrupt happens more, we are working on this issue, but the situation is much better than when the IC 74HC04 was used.


Thanks to all the friends who helped me
If you are looking for a "missing pulse" (sine half cycle) you
would like to do that at the peak, not the zero.

Way back when, I worked on motor controls where first we
would differentiate the line sine (after xfmr for safety) so
that -its- zero crossing indicated line peak. We used that
for phase-cut SCR control trigger (must trigger -after- peak
and always quit before zero, control was by delay-from-peak
to fire the SCRs onto the motor winding).

So you could get the peal location and at that location, sample
and compare (or just compare, if quick and clean enough) to
say whether you got a pulse or you didn't.

But trying to do that kind of triggering on a raggedy sine might
give you more than you wanted. The good part is, you'd be
working where the signal "should" be robust, and can set a
threshold well above "nothing at all" to declare a malformed
sine cycle - like if your xfmr secondary is 24VAC, call anything
less than 10V at peak "not right". Or maybe it's 5 or 2 or 1V,
but still not however many mV of line trash you might be
bothered by when looking for zero, one measure and done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top