The generated heat of a linear circuit does not depend on which parts are used. Neither bipolar, nor NPN, nor PNP, nor Mosfet, nor size, nor resistor, nor diodes.To avoid large heatsinks (even better passive cooling?) or fans (fans are unacceptable in this design) I think that much more powerful regulators should be used (or even more than one) so as for them to run cool, in conjunction to low voltage difference from their input to their output.
Klaus is giving good advice. the size and type of linear regulator makes no difference to the amount of heat it has to dissipate. That is down to plain ordinary Ohms Law (Voltage in - voltage out) / current out.
For a simple regulator that suits your requirement I would suggest a linear 3-pin device like the LM317 with a wrap-around bypass transistor. It's simple, effective and gives short circuit and overheat protection. Like this: https://www.circuitstoday.com/12v-15a-voltage-regulator
For 5A output you can omit two of the bypass transistors and the associated resistors and for variable voltage so you can get 13.8V use an adjustable regulator.
How it works is quite simple: the regulator IC does all the work at low currents, as the load current increases, so does the voltage drop across the resistor at it's input pin. When the voltage across the resistor exceeds the transistors B-E turn on voltage it starts to share the work and eventually passes most of the load current. You have to pick a suitable resistor value to start the transistor conducting before the IC maxes out. The great advantage of this simple design is that if the ICs thermal shutdown operates, it stops drawing current so the transistor shuts down too. It is wise to put them on the same heatsink so they protect each other.
I would also add a diode from the output to the input (top of the reservoir capacitor) wired non-conducting to protect against residual voltage from the load when the AC is turned off and also add a 1nF capacitor across each of the bridge rectifier diodes to minimize switching noise.
Brian.
I am thinking that maybe it will be easier (and cheaper) to avoid all the hassle use a regulator such as theLT1083? LT1083/LT1084/LT1085 - 7.5A, 5A, 3A Low Dropout Positive Adjustable Regulators (analog.com)
There are even ready kits in amazingly low prices.
and for 12.5-13v output? 17v transformer (unloaded)?For 14V output, you can need about 18-19V input to the regulator.
They already have short circuit protection in them.
So I need a transformer current rating double that of the output current of the PSU?Note that for a rectifier-capacitor filter power supply you need to de-rate the transformer's RMS current rating about 50% from the desired DC output, due to the high peak current drawn by the rectifier-filter, and the consequent high I squared R loss from the transformer winding resistances.
If you try to draw a DC current equal to the transformer RMS current rating, the transformer will seriously overheat and likely burn up.
Yes, for good margin.So I need a transformer current rating double that of the output current of the PSU?
Good hint!Yes, for good margin.
Minimum 1.6 times.
and for 12.5-13v output? 17v transformer (unloaded)?
a pi filter ( C- L - C ) will or can give higher than the average voltage if the 1st C is quite large - as it acts to capture the peak volts - the price for this is higher peak and therefore rms currents in the Tx ...
That is why I like the center-tapped winding. Each half is only half-active and that keeps the RMS current low. You can therefore use thinner wire (but double the number of turns) and the power lost the diodes is reduced.
There is only a point I now consider, the LT1083 is more powerful (8A if I remember right), so If I try to draw more current from it it will shut down.
But the transformer will be rated at 4A. So what happens if I try to draw more say 8A out of this PSU, that has this 4A transformer?
Will the transformer burn out? Will the LT1083 shut down because of the voltage drop in the transformer, due to the higher current asked from it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?