engr_joni_ee
Advanced Member level 3
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
- Messages
- 845
- Helped
- 2
- Reputation
- 4
- Reaction score
- 7
- Trophy points
- 18
- Activity points
- 7,045
So, are you doing a trial and error method with no 'science' behind? Are you aware that the intensity of the heat flux impacts the determination of the thickness of the heatsink base, as well as how much of the surface of this heatsink is in contact with the (metal?) surface of the heat source? That depending on whether there is not forced ventilation, this may impact on the need to increase or not this thickness, as well as to move the fins apart each other? As Klaus mentioned, important aspects of this design are not being addressed.I did some changes. Now it is 2.5 mm. I made two versions.
Thanks for sharing this document. I will go through this document to learn thermal calculation for given heat sink design.Clearly the machineability is just one issue, the other is there adequate thermal
benefits when fin spacing is low.....
Laminar versus turbulent flow considerations.
https://www.digikey.com/Site/Global/Layouts/DownloadPdf.ashx?pdfUrl=F51974C9A6D544F1A7D8F119514B67FF
Regards, Dana.
Can you please read the underlined headline of the graph ...What do different curves on the graph are representing ?
I am not sure how it shows curves for different heights.
I can´t stand it anymore ... I have to leave...I am wondering about what are the "footprints" available in 19, 21, 23, 27, 29, and 33. Is this number of fins ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?