Thanks a lot Kripton and Haran. I think it is clear how to calibrate.
Haran, I understand your remark about compairing good and bad capacitors. That is of course the most important function. But the reading is very accurate, so I do want to make it as precise as possible (I know it is a tick of me...).
One question about the 4066. I also saw a design of Elektor (Combi-C-Meter in sept. 2005) and they state that it is better to use a high speed version (HC4066). This to avoid unwanted reactance (or half it). Any thoughts about that?
Disadvantage of that meter for me is that you have to switch between C and ESR measurements.
Rob,Well I haven’t tried yet with 74HC4066 chip and I don’t think so you’ll see a Significant Changes by using 74HC4066 maybe not. I’m happy with CD4066. The device is fast quick display showing ESR & Capacitance.
Actually both chips are same price here in Canada. Two for a dollar if I get a chance I’ll try and let you know the feedback.
As far as I know Go ESR is the best complete open source available and smart people could tweak the ASM file Also comparing to Peak Atlas ESR I’m happy with the outcome and quick results. My buddy owns a Peak Atlas he’s surprised with this unit
Haran
Rob,Well I haven’t tried yet with 74HC4066 chip and I don’t think so you’ll see a Significant Changes by using 74HC4066 maybe not. I’m happy with CD4066. The device is fast quick display showing ESR & Capacitance.
Actually both chips are same price here in Canada. Two for a dollar if I get a chance I’ll try and let you know the feedback.
As far as I know Go ESR is the best complete open source available and smart people could tweak the ASM file Also comparing to Peak Atlas ESR I’m happy with the outcome and quick results. My buddy owns a Peak Atlas he’s surprised with this unit
Haran
If you’re focusing 1uf capacitor with 10uf, it’ll read 1uf exact 1uf and 10uf it’ll read 12.xxx or 8.xxx but just for the sake of calibration just play with it you’ll see what I meant.
hi,
the elektor c-esr meter uses a different method than the go esr meter
elektor needs a fast chopped switch, and a high speed chip can gives better results
go esr uses a constant current method, and the 4066 is here only to switch measure between current and voltage, dont need speed for it
I dont think a faster 4066 chip will improve the result, but only a real test can tell us the truth...
also
the peak esr meter has a fine feature : it discharges the capacitor before measuring if needed
the go esr doesnt have it, but the peak is so far more expensive that I prefer also the go esr meter !!!!
regards,
So, if you calibrated with a 1uF cap and try later a 10uF cap, I am sure the reading is between 8 and 12uF. But is that because the meter is not that accurate or is it because the values of the caps you used are not compared with another meter (so, exact value unknown)?
QUOTE]
Hi,
I have calibrated my ESR-C the "hardware" way and the readings are the same every time. Readings below 100uF are smaler than reality. For example:47uF - reading is 45uF, 4,7uF - reading is 4,3; 2,2uF - reading is 1,9uF; 1uf - reading is 0,7uF; 0,47uF - reading is 0,3uF.
The readings are the same every time for the same value and same manufacturer.
After few dozens of readings I know what a good cap and a bad cap look like. From my point of view, this device is the most "accurate" device ever. You know why? Because with this device you can tell which cap is good and which cap is bad without geting out of circuit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?