Device to act as 0 - 9V source

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's not a great picture, but it sure looks like you've got the battery connected to the wiper.

See post #11.

No, like the guy below said, the markings on the red board is right, the positioning of the pins dont match with the positioning of the tabs on the pot itself.


Youre right. I have now tested the pot and measured the ohms, and i got 10k from each end of the pot, and the wiper seemed to work like it should, from 0-10k ohms when turning it, with 5k at the middle.

What did you mean when you said the voltmeter range is 2.5-30V? Can it measure below 2.5V? And have you tried using a DVM to verify the readings from your little meter?

It can measure below 2,5V but its only a 2 wire voltmeter, so the voltage measured is also the voltage powering the voltmeter. Could this be the problem? When measuring it the intrument barley moved, so i would guess 50kohm>.
I am currently working on modifying it so that i can supply the voltmeter power from a seperate wire.

It is obvious that the pot is a logarithmic volume control, not a linear pot.
Without a load when it is turned to half then its output voltage is 0.45V to 0.9V. If it is turned down 20% then its output voltage might be 2.5V.

Im not sure that i get you right, but i got 5kohms in the middle position and 10k ohms to the far side.


I have yet to find an easily controllable voltage regulator.
I will look into the switching regulator.


The buck converter sounds awfully complicated to build and hard to control when i just want a 0-10v output.
How will a transistor work ?
 

Many digital voltmeters cannot measure the voltage that powers them.
Your voltmeter obviously does not have enough voltage to power it when the voltage is 2.5V or less.

Now that you measured the ohms of your pot then it is linear, not logarithmic.
 

when you taking the power from measuring end It takes a lot power from the source so that also loads the potentiometer, It takes the current for All LEDs in the meter... so it should be connected separately and it can take 10 uA in the measuring probe......
 

I think I would try powering the meter directly from the battery.
Use the pot across the battery as you have and add a rail to rail opamp wired as a non-inverting buffer.
The opamp would be powered from the battery (same as meter) and the +in terminal will go direct to the wiper.
The -in is wired directly to opamp output for 100% feedback.
Depending on the opamp this will allow 20mA or more o/p drive.

This will provide near zero to near Vbatt as your output not 0 to 10V as per the post title.
 

Heres an update for you who is still curious about this
Its been a while scince ive done anyting with it, but lately ive managed to salvage a LM317 voltage regualtor from an old VFD. Couldnt be bothered to order something online with a month shipping time...
I made a little circuit and it does its job well enough for me to use it. Range is from ~0,9V (0V if you turn it off of course) to ~8,9V.
**broken link removed** **broken link removed**
Ive done some modifications to make it work properly. First i poked around the voltmeter and found a spot to connect another wire so i coud push constant voltage from the battery to power it, now its as bright as the sun
**broken link removed**
Note: Ive separated the new wire from the old circuit by cutting it off at the edge of the white plug.
As some of the voltage drops over the LM317 ive gone over to a smaller 12V battery (23A).
The circuit:
**broken link removed**
I have yet to find a nice box to put it in.
Ive added 2 wires(red twisted pair) for battery test, however this measures only 10V even though the batt is 12V, my guess would be that there is some loss somewhere while the circuit is live. A pushbutton is going on these wires when put in a box.
Else the voltmeter is suprisingly accurate.
Note: Be careful when soldering on this type of switch as i use for my power switch for the circuit. IF it gets too hot it will melt and come loose inside.

Closeup of the circuit board:
**broken link removed**
I could make it one "hole" smaller in each direction but i want to have room for expansion.
Not the prettiest but i like it
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…