Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Channel length reduce in opamp

Status
Not open for further replies.

ljy4468

Full Member level 4
Full Member level 4
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
232
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Location
South Korea
Activity points
3,023
hi!!!

Thanks for answering my question. thanks

I have another problem.
I designed fully differential folded cascode circuit
and reduce channel length(1um->0.5um) (also reduced width, so W/L is same)
and simulated it.
The result is Av is down, unity gain BW is up, PM is up
I know why Av is down.
but why GB and PM is up?
please teach me why

Have a good day
....
 

the av is down,for the output resistance is smaller
GB and PM is up,is for size of the transitor is smaller,then parasitic capacitance is small,so the GB is up for the output node parasitc capacitance is smaller,so RC constant becomes smaller,then GB biger.
PM is up,for the second pole becomes bigger for that node's parasitic capcitance is smaller.

ljy4468 said:
hi!!!

Thanks for answering my question. thanks

I have another problem.
I designed fully differential folded cascode circuit
and reduce channel length(1um->0.5um) (also reduced width, so W/L is same)
and simulated it.
The result is Av is down, unity gain BW is up, PM is up
I know why Av is down.
but why GB and PM is up?
please teach me why

Have a good day
....
 

    ljy4468

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top