Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
It is the response from Microsoft to the new Athlon64 64-bit platform.
It enable Athlon64 to run in native 64-bit mode, while still being able to run legacy code at 32/16 bits.
Before XP 64, only Linux supported Athlon64. Without 64-bit OS, an Athlon64 is just a pricy fancy 32-bit CPU.
Note that without an Athlon64 or an Opteron processor, there is absolutely no use of upgrading to Windows XP 64. I havn't seen XP 64, but there isn't probably any difference in the look, from the currect 32-bit XP. It just enable 64-bit mode of the new processor, and probably have it's drivers and apps re-compiled for 64-bits.
So far, there isn't a lot of support for 64-bit platforms. Almost every programs on the market is still 32-bits. It's like when Win95 came out. It took some time before apps started to pop out at 32-bits. It will take some time before having 64-bits apps.
So, as long as you run 32-bits apps on XP 64, they won't go any faster. And there isn't probably a lot of fields that require 64 bits, but some of the most promising apps that would benefits are graphical apps, and other apps that need a lot of processing.
One of the nice side of Athlon64 though are the new registers, which were somewhat very limited on 32-bit processors. This could really speed-up some programs, when the compiler cache some variables in those registers instead of always loading/storing them to memory (due to the limited registers of 32-bits processors).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.