Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I guess the advantage of iRMX is that it has a definite known time to answer an interrupt. NT guarantees absolutely nothing. As for example it may spend 100 milliseconds checking a physical drive:-( So if you are doing real time stuff.. You are stuffed as well !
Video being one of the most demanding one for example.. 100 milliseconds in video terms is like eternity..
Hope this help..
Cheers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
