May 13, 2004 #1 Black Jack Full Member level 4 Joined Dec 2, 2003 Messages 236 Helped 14 Reputation 28 Reaction score 3 Trophy points 1,298 Location UKRAINE Activity points 1,817 LAN91C111 vs. W3100A Why SMSC`s LAN91C111 more cost then WIZNET W3100A (built-in stack) + RTL8201BL + Trans + RJ45? Are LAN91C111 is best?
LAN91C111 vs. W3100A Why SMSC`s LAN91C111 more cost then WIZNET W3100A (built-in stack) + RTL8201BL + Trans + RJ45? Are LAN91C111 is best?
May 14, 2004 #2 TEHb Member level 1 Joined Mar 26, 2002 Messages 35 Helped 6 Reputation 12 Reaction score 6 Trophy points 1,288 Location United Kingdom Activity points 235 Re: LAN91C111 vs. W3100A LAN91C111 is a 100MBit/s speed chip
May 14, 2004 #3 P pin Member level 2 Joined Nov 30, 2002 Messages 48 Helped 0 Reputation 0 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,286 Activity points 338 Re: LAN91C111 vs. W3100A The difference between these products is: - CPU Accesses 8, 16(!) and 32(!) Bit | 8 Bit only TCP/IP stack Your own | Built in PHY Integrated | External The temperature range, °C -10 to 70 | up to 40 to 85 (I version) So LAN91C111 is not the best. But seems to be it is a good chip. :morning:
Re: LAN91C111 vs. W3100A The difference between these products is: - CPU Accesses 8, 16(!) and 32(!) Bit | 8 Bit only TCP/IP stack Your own | Built in PHY Integrated | External The temperature range, °C -10 to 70 | up to 40 to 85 (I version) So LAN91C111 is not the best. But seems to be it is a good chip. :morning: