Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why are mealy FSMs not so common?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ricksanchez

Newbie
Newbie level 3
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Tampere, Finland
Activity points
1,319
Why are mealy FSMs not so common?
I am in a situation where I cannot avoid using it . I have a signal which determines the state of my FSM and also the same signal(without any delay) determines the output.
will it create any problem in STA?
 

Mealy establish a combinational path from input to output signals. Safe state machine design rules suggest that all input signals either originate from the FSM clock domain or are synchronized to it. If so, Mealy output signals can be processed in the same clock domain without problems, except for having probably a larger path delay.

If the output is used asynchronously or transferred to other clock domains, signal glitches come into view.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top