Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Which of these fully-differential ADCs has higher input dynamic range?

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

powersys

Advanced Member level 1
Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
439
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,981
I'm not familiar with fully differential ADCs. For example, the following two ADCs:

[A] LTC2389-16 - 16-Bit, 2.5Msps SAR ADC with Pin-Configurable Analog Input Range and 96dB SNR
Pin-Configurable Analog Input Range:
±4.096V Fully Differential
0V to 4.096V Pseudo-Differential Unipolar
±2.048V Pseudo-Differential Bipolar
https://www.linear.com/product/LTC2389-16

ADS8422 - 16 Bit 4MSPS Parallel ADC W/Ref, Pseudo Bipolar, Fully Differential Input
Fully Differential Input with Pseudo-Bipolar Input Range -4 V to +4 V
https://www.ti.com/product/ads8422

Are the input dynamic input ranges of both ADCs above the same? LTC2389-16 accepts pseudo-differential bipolar of ±2.048V whilst ADS8422 accepts pseudo-bipolar input of -4V to +4V. Or, ADS8422 has higher dynamic input range?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top