Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

which bus architecture for my SoC design?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Laplace

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
103
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
659
Is there any one who would like share his/her ideas on *optimal choice of SoC bus architecture?

Thanks..
 

You could evaluate AMBA (Advanced Microprocessor Bus Architecture)
proposed from ARM for SoC design. Looks well documented and has been used for ARM710 etc.

Also at xxx.opencores.org look for the Wishbone specifications. Many of open source designs there use Wishbone.

the_penetrator_in_extremis©
 

I think that AMBA is a good choice, becouse it has well-document and many IPs fellow AMBA specification. Most importance is that AMBA is open.
 

I would like to design with AMBA.
For high bandwidth, it provides the AHB/ASB with pipeline feature.
For low speed periperal, it defines the APB.

WISHBONE is also good, it is easy and left TAG for user-defined using.
But there it is not suitable for pipeline operation.


flowers
 

Has anyone used I/B/M's Core/Connect before?
 

it depends on what speed of your system and what speed of the interfaced system.
 

Yo to AMBA

I agree with EDAguy, but if you are looking at ease of imp at a decent performance AMBA would be the choice. :p
 

i need a simple but fast responsive bus architecture.. what about Wishbone?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top