Continue to Site

Where do you get "real" EMC information concerning SMPS?

cupoftea

Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
3,348
Helped
65
Reputation
132
Reaction score
154
Trophy points
63
Activity points
17,304
Hi,
Just received another free email from

...i always read their articles with interest.
However, i have never found an EMC tutorial site, or EMC book, which tells the "real dirty truth" of EMC for SMPS.

For example, its a fact that you can worsen common mode emissions for an SMPS by overdoing the Diff Mode filtration.
EMC is full of such wonderments, but no website speaks of such phenomena.....or do you know of one that does?

Another "real dirty truth" is that floating metal, or a floating metal enclosure, around or near an SMPS can cause it to stop working. (By floating i
mean there are no direct connections to circuit or capacitive connections.)

Where do you find these dirty truths?

This article is as close as it gets to giving away dirty truths....

..in there, they confess that virtually no hard switching offline SMPS can ever truly pass Radiated Emissions EMC testing (to EU/A/NZ/UK/USA standards) unless it is caged in a metal enclosure.

Another filthy truth is that if you have a large number of paralleled SMPS's, then you set yourself up to get massive ground loop problems for EMC. You can mitigate this by using low value common mode chokes at the input and output of each SMPS thats paralleled.

Another filthy truth is that with an offline SMPS, you can actually often pass EMC by literally turning the common mode choke through 90 degrees.
Yet another dirty truth is that often you can pass EMC for offline SMPS by adding in a small common mode choke wound with a few turns of insulated wire (not ECW)...the insulation keeps the metal strands apart such that interwinding capacitance is reduced.
Another dirty truth is that if you have an offline SMPS screwed to an earthed heatsink, (which often also acts as its enclosure) then you must connect (either directly or capacitively) the circuit's GND (or other quiet node), to the earthed heatsink.
Another dirty truth is that often connecting a small common mode choke wound with insulated wire (as discussed above) right by the mains input connector often passes EMC.

And another dirty truth is that connecting Y caps L-E and N-E upstream of the common mode choke of an offline SMPS can often make common mode EMC worse (even though it generally improves common mode EMC immunity).

Another dirty truth concerns offline SMPS for which the secondary is connected to earth....if so, then far better EMC is achieved if you make a shielded earth connection from the earth wire in the mains input cable, to the secondary ground (or if not shielded then torroid wrap it). If the secondary is then also earthed from another connection there (which it often is), then you should add a ferrite bead into that earth connection (or wrap it round a torroid a few times) to avoid a big low Z earth loop. Also, adding a y cap from pri to sec of isolation transformer helps here.....and also increasing the Y cap from "downstream sides [L&N] of common mode choke to earth".

In relation to this last point, is that no EMC book states how the EMC is usually made far worse by connecting the secondary of an offline SMPS to earth ground via an external earth connection (ie, not via the mains input cable earth). -It obviously results in an enormous & horrendous earth loop.

Another dirty truth is that the "L-E" Y capacitor in many offline SMPS's is often dead. (Also the y cap across the transformer).
This is because common mode transients are the most common of the large transients and they eventually pop open
the "L-E" y cap. The "N-E" y cap isn't so badly affected as Neutral is usually connected to earth at most installations anyway. Even if there
is a MOV "L-N" it has "let-through" voltage. This is one reason why when you connect a y cap from an offline SMPS
to an earthed metal enclosure...if you only can fit in one Y capacitor....then put it "N-E" instead of "L-E".

Another DT is that MOVs are usually connected L-N, even though common mode transients are far more common and damaging. (N is connected to earth at most installations)

Another DT is that connecting a large 450V electrolytic via a diode bridge to the incoming L/N is generally the best form of mains transient protection since it will soak the surge up and not die like a MOV which unfortunately crowbars the fuse. There is only one piece of literature on the web that confess's this dirty truth, and its in a Synqor datasheet.

Another DT is that streetlights often don't have their neutral connection connected to earth anywhere near
the actual streetlight. This means that common mode transients can wreak havoc. Often the streetlight's
local L and N are taken transiently up to thousands of volts above earth. (ie above the voltage of the actual earth
wire that's in the mains cable coming to the streetlight)
So basically for a streetlight it would often be best to connect a power resistor in this earth wire say 10 Ohms.
Then you connect a large electrolytic from L to earth via diode bridge (downstream of the resistor)
...and ditto Neutral to earth.
This gives the best transient protection for the streetlight.
Add a TVS in parallel to the lytic, and a high value discharge resistor.
The dirty truths of Streetlight transient protection still aren't understood, and this is why today, many miles/kilometres of the UK motorways have no streetlights...even the M25 "ring of hell".
A streetlight on a motorway should be non isolated...its PSU should be in the base near the ground where its easily accessible for failure replacement.....any LED heatsink should simply be connected to neutral. You dont want any earth on that streetlight head MCB LED heatsink , since it may well end up thousands of volts apart from L and N due to lightning strike. The earth to the streetlight should be earthed at local to the streetlight, but very often isnt.
 
Last edited:
- good EMC resources do address these truths with backup (e.g., in filter design guides or Henry Ott’s EMC books).
- any tolerance imbalance in differential mode degrades CMRR, including Y caps and DM coils
- the effects of a "floating metal enclosure" does not guarantee failure, it just increases crosstalk to a shared conductor boundary which may help or hurt depending on the I/O coupling pF to the shield. It may permit more antenna effects which are bi-directional.
- The need for an earth offline shield makes huge assumptions in an EDN article that ignores shielded inductors and effective layout techniques and eliminate floating ground planes under switched inductors that can improve radiation effects.
- "Paralleled SMPS's cause massive ground loop problems" is not a secret, since shunted ground currents accumulate and is a known issue in EMC design.
- "Turning the CM choke 90 degrees can pass EMC" is anedotal and depends on the vector radiation on the I/O cables which may be tuned to reduce far field results.
- "Small CM choke with insulated wire reduces interwinding capacitance" This is a good trick as no transformer or CM is effective more than 2 decades for all parameters, so cascaded CM chokes are often done.
- "Y-caps upstream of CM choke can worsen CM emissions" This is not universal and depends on design quality of balanced Y caps and noise profiles. In some cases it can improve results.
- Earthed secondary can also use a ferrite bead to a second earth connection to break low-impedance loops. It also raises the breakdown stress of primary components to PE by shunting the isolation effects of the transformer with PE grounded DC and OEM's never test isolated ACDC supplies with DC PE grounded unless asked by request.
 
Last edited:
Most experienced power electronics engineers who have made product to pass standards know all about the " issues " you raise - and many others - they know how to design for " quietness " in the first place - to answer your question - you would talk to such an experienced person - remembering that - all applications are different, and if you have painted yourself into a particular corner - there are limited remediation options.

There are few EMC design rules that cover all situations - good knowledge based on experience stops one heading down ( or accepting ) bad pathways.
 
if you have painted yourself into a particular corner - there are limited remediation options.
Thanks yes this is right, you often get called in late-stage to sort an EMC issue long after everythings been designed and fixed in place.
And every company you go to has a list of stories which they tell about cranky ways in which they passed EMC testing....
eg the one about how they got the product through EMC by unscrewing the earth terminal from the enclosure, and re-screwing it in an inch to the left......and voila...EMC pass!

And then there's the engineer who designed a lot of the PSU's for British military equipment, saying that adding ferrite beads , chokes and Y capacitors to pass EMC is done like "adding currents to a cake mix".
 


Write your reply...

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top