Hi everyone,
The PLL output spectrum seems abnormally wide as shown in the attachment. It's a 20 GHz PLL design with 92 MHz reference and 256 divider-N. Can anyone tell me the potential reason?
Thanks,
I cannot see any attachment, but an "abnormally wide" output spectrum from such PLO like yours can have two basic sources:
a. out of lock, the PLO is "searching", and the wide spectrum has narrow distances between the lines which change by spectrum analyzer setting. Check the reference signal power, frequency and stability.
b. interference on DC power line (or in the reference line), coming often from a switching C power supply and /or voltage regulator. For PLO's, use preferably a linear power supply, and check the voltage with a scope. Any interference with a voltage > 30-50 mV p-p can drive the phase noise high.
I used similar structures locked from references like yours, without problems. The only other than the nominal output frequency should be spaced by the reference (or reference divided) frequency. My PLOs used a multiplied reference; using a divider may complicate the optimum function.
- - - Updated - - -
Hi everyone,
The PLL output spectrum seems abnormally wide as shown in the attachment. It's a 20 GHz PLL design with 92 MHz reference and 256 divider-N. Can anyone tell me the potential reason?
Thanks,
I cannot see any attachment, but an "abnormally wide" output spectrum from such PLO like yours can have two basic sources:
a. out of lock, the PLO is "searching", and the wide spectrum has narrow distances between the lines which change by spectrum analyzer setting. Check the reference signal power, frequency and stability.
b. interference on DC power line (or in the reference line), coming often from a switching C power supply and /or voltage regulator. For PLO's, use preferably a linear power supply, and check the voltage with a scope. Any interference with a voltage > 30-50 mV p-p can drive the phase noise high.
I used similar structures locked from references like yours, without problems. The only other than the nominal output frequency should be spaced by the reference (or reference divided) frequency. My PLOs used a multiplied reference; using a divider may complicate the optimum function.
- - - Updated - - -
Now I can see the picture: it is a typical "out -of-lock" situation. Try to tune the microwave oscillator till it locks. If it does mot, check my answer a. above.