What is the most stable LINUX system to run EDA?

[neoflash]

I'm an analog designer and was considering set up a linux workstation to run some EDA tools, such as Cadence 5141, HSPICE, Calibre (DRC/LVS) and Matlab etc.

I tried Ubuntu but too much trouble with older version EDAs.

Any suggestions?

Regards,
Neo

 

[rjkrocks]

Fedora Electronics Lab (FEL) would be a nice one....... a lot of good packages are already there......**broken link removed**

 

[yadavvlsi]

In my opinion Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the best. But this is not freely available. It is commercial. In free, you can try Fedora 14.
Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux

 

[renanbirck]

I would go with CentOS or Scientific Linux, the two are built from the same source code as Red Hat Enterprise Linux is.

 

[skogsjanne]

If you want to use commercial tools you are pretty much stuck with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

If you don't want to pay for the OS there are clones such as:
DistroWatch.com: CentOS
DistroWatch.com: Scientific Linux
DistroWatch.com: Fermi Linux
DistroWatch.com: Oracle Linux

They are all based on RHEL. Of these I think CentOS is the "original", Scientific is created by CERN and Fermi Labs, Fermi is based on Scientific and Oracle is a rip-off.

In the past I have used CentOS and found it as boring as Red Hat. But the tools ran perfectly on it.

 

[neoflash]

If I want to run cadence 5141, hspice, and calibre, which one would smoothly run all three of them?

If you want to use commercial tools you are pretty much stuck with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

If you don't want to pay for the OS there are clones such as:
DistroWatch.com: CentOS
DistroWatch.com: Scientific Linux
DistroWatch.com: Fermi Linux
DistroWatch.com: Oracle Linux

They are all based on RHEL. Of these I think CentOS is the "original", Scientific is created by CERN and Fermi Labs, Fermi is based on Scientific and Oracle is a rip-off.

In the past I have used CentOS and found it as boring as Red Hat. But the tools ran perfectly on it.

 

[scorp.]

Red Hat and CentOS are best i think.

 

[eld03]

RHEL 4.8 is least common denominator. all tools will run on this version.

 

[jimjim2k]

Hi

Centos 5.0 or even Centos 4.7 are fine from my view


tnx

 

[kamilsok]

Basically any Linux would be fine (Ubuntu is rather specific, since it hides a lot under the "user-friendlyness" coat).

Currently I run Gentoo as my main workstation but have been using OpenSuSE, Fedora, Debian, CentOS and Arch for hardware/software design and they all did fine (much better then Windows).

As most Linux users, I would recommend trying a couple distros that You find most appealing and picking the one that suits You most. May take a while, but it's worth it.

 

[RetroTechie]

Basically any Linux would be fine (Ubuntu is rather specific, since it hides a lot under the "user-friendlyness" coat).

Currently I run Gentoo as my main workstation but have been using OpenSuSE, Fedora, Debian, CentOS and Arch for hardware/software design and they all did fine (much better then Windows).

I'd have to disagree... I've been running Xilinx ISE design software (current versions) on Debian stable, and even though that OS is not supported by Xilinx, ISE runs fine on it. Debian stable is rock solid, it basically runs forever until the hardware fails. :-D But I have seen ISE crash a few times, and perhaps those crashes wouldn't have occurred on one of the supported OS'es. Also the 1st answer you get on any Xilinx forum support question, is "that OS is not supported". Usually then other posters will follow with tips & solutions, but it's still a bit annoying.

So: the vendor declares specific OS'es as supported, the more you deviate from that, the more you are 'asking' for trouble. If just getting the job done is important, I'd go with a vendor-supported OS. Or a free derivate like CentOS in the case of RHEL. Whether that's an OS you like is then less important than maximizing the chance that the design software will work.

Original poster was asking to setup a workstation to run a few specific vendor tools. Gentoo might work fine for you (like Debian does for me), but neither is good advice for the topic starter, if it's known that the software to run states different OS'es as supported (disclaimer: I wouldn't know which those are for the tools mentioned, but other posters already covered that).

Modern Linux distro's may look at lot alike under the hood (or not... ;-) ), but electronic design software can be very complex software suites, sometimes very picky about what it runs on. Even if it appears to work well, there might be some lesser used functions/tools that may act up. Which you'll only find out later, after having gone through the trouble of setting everything up. Even worse is the possibility where everything seems to work, but fails in more subtle ways (like files produced which don't match your design / not correct in some way).

 

[fredd]

i go for Red Hat.

 

[kamilsok]

I'd have to disagree... I've been running Xilinx ISE design software (current versions) on Debian stable, and even though that OS is not supported by Xilinx, ISE runs fine on it. Debian stable is rock solid, it basically runs forever until the hardware fails. :-D But I have seen ISE crash a few ...QUOTE]

My suggestions where based on my experiences with listed Linux distros.. and I must add that I've encountered (mostly minor and one google that away) problems on all of them.

What I wanted to say was that after trying out a couple of distributions You should go on with the one that fits You most because the probability of problem occurence is basically the same (especially with variety of propriatary tools).

One thing I would mention is that if You would go for support (not official but community), then probably Red Hat, CentOS or Fedora are Your guys since they are mostly used by hardware developers.