Is this the only reason why the AC main power frequency was 'choosen' to be 50Hz or 60Hz? But why not 10Hz or 20Hz? Lower frequency, the eddy current losses at transformer also less. Why 50Hz or 60Hz? Is it choosen 'technically' or because of 'conventionally'?Big Boy said:The power cables, running from the power facility to the end users, are very long (lots of miles of cables). The higher the frequency, the higher the cables act as an inductor. This is why the frequency is low (50 or 60 Hz), to minimize this problem.
This sentence reminded me on RFID or SMART card. If I'm not mistaken, the RFID tag and SMART card both work on this principle, right?djalli said:Why you dont collect the free energy from power radiated in air by TV broadcastings, radios?
onemilimeter said:This sentence reminded me on RFID or SMART card. If I'm not mistaken, the RFID tag and SMART card both work on this principle, right?djalli said:Why you dont collect the free energy from power radiated in air by TV broadcastings, radios?
------
What about generated electricity from 'earth magnetic field'? Is anyone doing research on this?
------
HCM_bucat said:I guess the key thing here is the power integration is 0. How can that be?
does the company sue u or the government?? ok... but if that is the case... u know for lowering the power dissipated people now use non-sinusoidal functions for both voltages or currents... (if i am right)... which will have the peak power higher but the average power is lesser than the conventional methods... these are all attempts to get the o/p power minimum as possible... so why should they sue?... we generate power for running a device,,, it works disspates no power... right...echo47 said:However, the power company may frown upon what you are doing, and charge you for having a crazy power factor load
does the company sue u or the government?? ok... but if that is the case... u know for lowering the power dissipated people now use non-sinusoidal functions for both voltages or currents... (if i am right)... which will have the peak power higher but the average power is lesser than the conventional methods... these are all attempts to get the o/p power minimum as possible... so why should they sue?... we generate power for running a device,,, it works disspates no power... right...
djalli said:If you live in the country you can build possibly 2-3 km wire-wound antenna not very far to power lines go and "obtain" energy from these lines. Can this be detected very much? Or is a fancy imagination nobody will notice?
nicleo said:Interesting ...
Do you mean the 60Hz voltage is the AC main (e.g. 120V/60Hz)?
Could you please elaborate more how do you carry out the integration? Thanks
djalli said:If you live in the country you can build possibly 2-3 km wire-wound antenna not very far to power lines go and "obtain" energy from these lines. Can this be detected very much? Or is a fancy imagination nobody will notice?
me2please said:I agree with echo 47 BUT I think you still have to pay. Why?
I think when your device generate energy back to the system, the meter won't roll backward for you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?