VHDL sram testbench problem..

I'm writing a testbench for sram, but i found the port map type in my testbench which does not match to the sram.vhd, i have no idea how to rectify it. Below are the sram design and my testbench design. Could anyone give me some tips how to rectify my testbench in order to test the sram.vhd? Thank you...

-- sram.vhd
Library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
Entity SRAM1 is
Port(
clk,cen,wen : in std_logic;
addr: in unsigned(6 downto 0);
din : in unsigned(31 downto 0);
dout: out unsigned(31 downto 0)
);
End SRAM1;
architecture syn of SRAM1 is
type ram_type is array (127 downto 0) of unsigned (31 downto 0);
signal RAM : ram_type:=(others=>(others=>'0'));
begin
process (clk)
begin
if clk'event and clk = '1' then
if cen='0' then
if wen ='0' then
RAM(to_integer(addr)) <= din;
else
dout <= RAM( to_integer(addr));
end if;
else
dout <= (others => 'Z');
end if;
end if;
end process;
end syn;


--tb_sram.vhd
library IEEE;
use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all;
use IEEE.std_logic_arith.all;
use IEEE.std_logic_unsigned.all;
use IEEE.numeric_std.all;

entity TB_ADDER IS
end TB_ADDER;
architecture TEST of TB_ADDER is

component SRAM1 is
Port( clk, cen,wen : in std_logic;
addr: in std_logic_vector(6 downto 0);
din : in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0);
dout: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0) );
End component;

signal clk_i, cen_i,wen_i : std_logic;
signal addr_i : std_logic_vector(6 downto 0);
signal din_i,dout_i : std_logic_vector(31 downto 0);
begin
DUT: SRAM1 port map (clk_i, cen_i,wen_i,addr_i,din_i,dout_i);
process begin
clk_i<='0';
wait for 5 ns;
clk_i<='1';
wait for 5 ns;
end process;
STIMULUS: process
begin
cen_i<='1';
wen_i<='0';

For i in 0 to 127 loop
din_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i <= i; din_i<= i;
wait until(clk'event and clk='1');
End loop;
Wen_i<='1';

For i in 0 to 127 loop
addr_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i <= i;
wait until(clk'event and clk='1');
End loop;
end process STIMULUS;
end TEST;

Hi,

Use named association in the port map instead of positional association. When using named association you can use conversion functions in the port map to convert from unsigned to std_logic_vector and v.v.

Devas

hi, devas

i used this statment to replace the positional association, but the complier is still warning me "Types do not match for port addr", do you have another idea.... thank you so much!

DUT: SRAM1 port map (clk=>clk_i,
cen=>cen_i,
wen=>wen_i,
addr=>addr_i,
din=>din_i,
dout=>dout_i);

Declare them as unsigned signals.

--vipin
https://vhdlguru.blogspot.com/

thanks vipinlal
the blog is very useful! I'm now still finding the problem.
i changed my program below, but it generated some error... i uploaled the image below.. Thanks again...

library IEEE;
use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all;
use IEEE.std_logic_arith.all;
use IEEE.std_logic_unsigned.all;
use IEEE.numeric_std.all;

entity TB_ADDER IS
end TB_ADDER;
architecture TEST of TB_ADDER is

component SRAM1 is
Port( clk, cen,wen : in std_logic;
addr: in unsigned(6 downto 0);
din : in unsigned(31 downto 0);
dout: out unsigned(31 downto 0) );
End component;

signal clk_i, cen_i,wen_i : std_logic;
signal addr_i : unsigned(6 downto 0);
signal din_i,dout_i : unsigned(31 downto 0);
begin
DUT: SRAM1 port map (clk=>clk_i,
cen=>cen_i,
wen=>wen_i,
addr=>addr_i,
din=>din_i,
dout=>dout_i);
process begin
clk_i<='0';
wait for 5 ns;
clk_i<='1';
wait for 5 ns;
end process;
STIMULUS: process
begin
cen_i<='1';
wen_i<='0';

For i in 0 to 127 loop
din_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i <= i; din_i<= i;
wait until(clk'event and clk='1');
End loop;
Wen_i<='1';

For i in 0 to 127 loop
addr_i<=to_unsigned(i,32);
addr_i <= i;
wait until(clk'event and clk='1');
End loop;
end process STIMULUS;
end TEST;

dont use numeric_std along with "std_logic_arith" and "std_logic_unsigned".

EitheR use

(OR)


I suggest you go foR the second one.


--vipin
https://vhdlguru.blogspot.com/

THANKS vipinlal so much !!~

Finally, i completed the simulation, and i found i made some careless mistake , so that i could not simulate before.

Thanks again!!!!~