Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

VCO starting factor of three alpha/safety

Status
Not open for further replies.

mazelk

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
105
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Location
COLOMBIA
Activity points
1,143
VCO starting constrain

According with some reported VCO designs, active transconductance must overcome to tank transconductance, at least, in a factor of three (that they call "alpha" factor, or safety factor)

Why this amount?

I guess that it's not completelly true. As you increase "alpha", you increase transistor geometry (for same bias current) and drain capacitance (I mean about a complementary LC VCO). This reduce LC tank inyected current, and voltage swing. This increase phase noise.

Regarding those assumptions, which "safety factor " should I take to overcome tank loses?

Is it polite to consider that increasing "safety factor" could lead to drawback ??
 

VCO starting constrain

I think it is necessary to keep the safety factor, to increase safety factor, you can increase W/L, if increase W can cause the problem you said, then you can reduce L. Also LC tank is a key in VCO. The Q has effect on safety factor also. If the safety factor is low, the simulation may hard to convergy
 

Re: VCO starting constrain

Is the VCO starup constrain related with synthesizer control signal bandwidth ??

I mean, increasing "alpha" LC tank poles are rigth shifted, decreasing damping and decreasing "Tao" for exponential envelope.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top