In this specific case, what might have happened - device name remained same - just the device type mismatch has happened.
On Sch side - it is mimcap(CAP), versus on layout side - it is mimcap(Generic)
Either this 'mimcap' has been extracted from layout using extractDevice() command instead of using extractCap() - And at times that is legal and necessary for various reasons, it is done purposely to utilize strength/flexibility of generic device extraction.
There are several ways to address that mismatch issue:
1. adding a binding file usually mentioned as "bind.rul" please check, you might be already having one - shipped with the PDK you are using.
might be named as auLvs.bind or auCdl.bind (usage depends on schematic is in dfII or CDL/Spice )
Here "bind.rul" needs a line:
C mimcap(CAP) mimcap(Generic)
2. Convert generic device to standard device by :
2.a. using capDevice() command :
under layout netlisting syntax of avCompareRule
capDevice("mimcap(GENERIC)" )
2.b. Add namePrefix("C") or namePrefix("XC") of
course understanding full implication of its usage.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?