Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Travel made easy - IDEA

Status
Not open for further replies.

rednewguy

Full Member level 2
Full Member level 2
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
123
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Activity points
2,413
I have an idea. suppose that we have to travel from point P(source) to point Q(destination). Let us assume that it takes Xa fuel and Ya time to reach there by path A. And assume that it take Xb fuel and Yb time to reach there by path B.

path A------Normal route taken by planes.
path B------New path. first it flies to above earth's atmosphere, travels in the direction opposite to earth's rotation towards the destination, descends from atmosphere.
83_1162279723.GIF


Advantages:
1) As it makes most of the path above atmosphere where it is devoid of air and gravitation, we can use non-conventional energy sources thereby reducing fuel consumption.
2) As it takes the path opposite to earth's rotation, the destination is approaching us: thereby saving time taken to reach.

Disadvantages:
1) The first main concern is re-entrance into earth's atmosphere
2) As it is taking the opposite direction to earth' rotation, we may experience drag.

I dont know whether this idea will be applicable for passenger traffic, may be tried atleast for freights.
U can comment on this. both advt and disadvt.

thanks
 

Re: Travel made easy

If the destination is on the opposite side of earth its certanly better to fly against earh rotaion. On shorter distance fuel costs and the rest of the things you said should be taken under concideration.

mayyan
 

Re: Travel made easy

mayyan said:
If the destination is on the opposite side of earth its certanly better to fly against earh rotaion. On shorter distance fuel costs and the rest of the things you said should be taken under concideration.

Ofcourse, I agree with u mayyan. The fuel efficiency in this case will be applicable only for trans-oceanic transports.
 

Another disadvantage is that the cost of fuel to send a vehicle up into the upper atmosphere will be expensive also. The vehicle will have to travel against gravity first. Since the vehicle is also be travelling with respect to the earth rotation at first, fuel will also be required to actually move the vehicle to the destination.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top