cupoftea
Advanced Member level 6
Hi,
Do you know why the shown HHC method of LLC control never took off (brought out 7 years ago)
It has no downsides, makes control easier, and can make transient response faster, and is cheap (UCC25640), and reduces BOM cost since smaller output caps are needed.
...But nobody uses it..why?
One problem that i can think of with LLC + HHC is that if the PFC output voltage falls, then the LLC has problems because LLC's are not conducive to operating with a wide input voltage range....so it seems a waste of time improving the transient response when the transient is likely to also result in the PFC output voltage (the LLC's input voltage) getting pulled down so low that the TTF cannot properly operate anyway.
Do you know why the shown HHC method of LLC control never took off (brought out 7 years ago)
It has no downsides, makes control easier, and can make transient response faster, and is cheap (UCC25640), and reduces BOM cost since smaller output caps are needed.
...But nobody uses it..why?
One problem that i can think of with LLC + HHC is that if the PFC output voltage falls, then the LLC has problems because LLC's are not conducive to operating with a wide input voltage range....so it seems a waste of time improving the transient response when the transient is likely to also result in the PFC output voltage (the LLC's input voltage) getting pulled down so low that the TTF cannot properly operate anyway.
Last edited: