Transformer centre tapped or normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Heating at no load is a different thing, caused by core losses when the transformer is designed with unsuitable high flux.
But the cumulative flux in the transformer never reduces when loading So the eddy current loss cant reduce, for high resistance primary winding the reduction in flux may happen, still that will cause more power dissipation in the primary winding. Any way the total heat loss is mainly proportional to the load.

Then How it is possible to reduction in heat when loading, I thought it was his perception.
 

I dont want the thread to be completed without that information. Yes it is possible that a transformer can get more heat in no load and low heat in load condition. It was nearly like a CT, but a potential transformer.

Assumption:
A step down transformer with comparatively very high primary winding resistance, very few core segments but not single, low resistance secondary.

Operation:
A very high primary resistance in the transformer can be considered as a resistive load instead of inductive load. so the current through the primary winding is mostly depend on the winding resistance instead of flux in the core.

So this transformer can be assumed as a multi turn primary CT transformer with highly resistive load in series. hence the transformer is designed to provide the flux enough to produce a full load current in rated voltage, it will produce more flux in the no load condition and the flux will reduce in loaded condition due to secondary flux.

A high value of flux may produce square of eddy current loss in the core but the load will reduce the flux and also the eddy current loss. but the loss in secondary winding is low because of low winding resistance. So now total variable loss is increased and the constant loss is very much decreased.

(obviously In this case we cant tell the eddy current loss as constant, because the cumulative flux in the core is not constant)

due to more loss in no load condition, the transformer is heating more. but this is a poorly designed transformer because high power loss in primary winding, the current taken from the primary is not relevant to secondary, so it will take unwanted current when there is no load in the secondary.

Advantages:
Small size, small power so small loss in power, less complication in design and low cost.

But I have totally made assumptions based on my theoretical knowledge, So im not that much particular about the amount of change in primary current.

As for OPs concern, no need for confusion and just select a good transformer of some more power rating.
 

Actually nobody told about heat reduction with loading. Audioguru just reported that the bad transformer "didn't get much hotter" when loaded.

Theoretically it's possible with a respective combination of leakage inductance and saturation flux. But it's a pure theoretical consideration and - related to the original question of this thread - more or less off topic.
 

Hello friends ,

I used 250mA transformer instead of 150mA and the heating was considerably reduced.
Now finally using 7-0-7 with 250mA rating .........in the design
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…