technique to compensate for temp co in an equalizer gain

Status
Not open for further replies.

jayanth.neo

Junior Member level 1
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
15
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,426
Hi,

There is a 3 stage equalizer on the receiver side operating at 5Gb/s. The gain of the individual stages and hence the total gain of the equalizer varies with temperature from -25 to 125 ( negative temp co). Each stage comprises of a Resistive loaded Diff pair( Resistors are used to ensure maximum bandwidth of operation,otherwise I would have tried a voltage controlled resistor using pmos devices, the resistors used have negative temp co).

I had plans of using positive and negative temp co resistors in parallel, or using voltage controlled resistors controlled by a bandgap but a simple analog control technique is what I am looking for that will give me reasonable result.

What kind of circuit technique can be used to compensate for the temperature dependency of the gain so that the gain is fairly constant over the temp range of -25 to 125.

The equalizer is a simple 3 stage equalizer, each stage being a resistive loaded diff pair. I can post the circuit schematic due to Ip rights issue.

Any suggestions from the bright analog minds are greatly appreciated.
 

I have similar problem as well.
However, this is a hard problem as there usually no compensation for PVT in EQ design.
I would try to change the current bias from some Vt/R that varies with temperature to get more current, thus the gm of EQ be higher in high T and lower in low T to get compensation
 

Yes, making the bias current of a bipolar differential pair ~T compensates the first order gm variation effect. For MOSFET, the
dependance is different, but you can design a reference circuit that achieves constant gm.
 

FvM

The problems come with a trade-off between bandwidth and compensation. As u add too many components on the simple high-pass filter in EQ, you are adding lots of parasitics, which affects too much the bandwidth for typical Gb/s serial link, so it's still tough
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…