Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Sinusoidal PWM with comparator

Status
Not open for further replies.

kishore3677

Member level 2
Member level 2
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
47
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,600
Hi,

I was trying PWM by giving a sine wave and triangle wave in a comparator. Could anybody explain what should be the frequency of triangle and sine wave? and Why?
 

Hi naveen

Ya, it was a nice link. But I have one question. The carrier frequency is given in the range 2K-15Khz,
now what to choose? why?
 

In some applications it may be desirable to have a higher PWM carrier frequency even though the resolution may be
limited. The higher carrier frequency can allow using smaller inductors in switching circuits and is also easier to filter
from the output. The limited resolution can also be improved by “dithering” the PWM output. This method effectively
creates intermediate duty cycle values by alternating between two duty cycle values
 

One point is the transients in PWM as well as response time Tr for the product goes very high with higher carrier freq.
However , this is compensated by higher noise levels , RFI/EMI and spike in the output .
It further improves the efficiency/performance and lowers down on ferrite heat losses upto 30KHz.
 

Hi Vimal,

I just wanted to know if there is a mathematical way of expressing pulse width as a difference of triangle and sine wave input.
 

You set your frequency based on what you need your loop
bandwidth to be (load step response) and what size of
ferrite you can stand (physical size). Tens of kHz is so
'80s. Maybe somebody was using a comparator with a
sporty 1uS prop delay or something.

Sine wave is going to get real jittery when you approach
the crest or valley. I can't think of a reason to want a
sine wave reference oscillator other than one you get
for free, which 15kHz would not be. It's bone simple to
make a triangle wave (or switched-RC) in CMOS.
 

Could anybody explain what should be the frequency of triangle and sine wave? and Why?
PWM spells pulse width modulation. Without having a particular modulating signal (e.g. a sine), why using a PWM? The question refers to your PWM application. What is it?

A popular sine PWM application is UPS or motor inverter. In the former case, it's e.g. 50 Hz. Some criteria for PWM frequency have been mentioned: core size, "noise", core losses. Not yet mentioned but even more important are switching losses.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top