Simulating Inductor SRF using Lumped Elements

Status
Not open for further replies.

chiques

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
170
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
California
Activity points
2,556
I see that the equation to determine SRF of a capacitor or inductor is:

https://www.coilcraft.com/getmedia/8ef1bd18-d092-40e8-a3c8-929bec6adfc9/doc363_measuringsrf.pdf


1677544406618.png

1677544412476.png




But when I follow this simulated circuit shown on https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/self-resonant-frequency , the equation is the following for an inductor.

1677544424608.png

I see they mentioned they added a factor of 1000 so the equation works out. What I don’t understand is why the equation is way off from the SRF version.

Note: The Microwaves simulation in my simulator is close but still off. I get 1.7GHz SRF where they get 2.3GHz.

1677544447914.png

When I try to correct the simulation to 1677544463564.png



I get:

1677544470878.png


Anyone have any idea what I’m missing here?
 

Are you assuming that any RF inductor has a parallel capacitance of 1 pF? It's just a typical value used in the microwaves article. Has to be replaced by an actual value for your inductor. Also ESR may be different.
 
I think it's just a typo: in the article (of microwave101) they wrote pi*2 instead of pi^2 and SRF*2 instead of SRF^2. The factor 1000 is used only to convert between measurement units.
 
I don't know from where are the 1.7GHz and 2.3GHz results.
51nH in parallel to 0.2pF resonates on 1.576GHz.
 

I think it's just a typo: in the article (of microwave101) they wrote pi*2 instead of pi^2 and SRF*2 instead of SRF^2. The factor 1000 is used only to convert between measurement units.
This is confusing because if I correct their typo's, the circuit does not simulate :/
 

Status
Not open for further replies.