Life L.E.D VS CCFL
This is still an iffy subject but finally some light was shed when I did more research. I found something incredible. LED's offer the same life expectancy then CCFL's for the most part in LCDs. Keep in mind these life expectancies are for different applications not just LCD's, although I did manage to get some numbers)
CCFL life expectancy: 8,000-100,000 (25,000-75,000 appear to be common life expectancy in LCD's, I found no reference to 100,000 hour CCFL's used in LCD's)
LED Life expectancy (Dependant on color): 25,000-100,000 (50,000 hours is the common life expectancy in most applications** I found no reference to 100,000 hour LED's used in LCD's just claims that LED's "can" have life expectancy of 100,000 hours)
Keep in mind however LED's are subject to failing from heat, while CCFL do not.
**However life expectancy ranges from white, red, blue, etc. Red has the worst life expectancy, just how much worse I could not find however most sources say it's substantially worse.
Verdict: This is a very complex verdict. While I was able to pull up numbers I also found a lot of sources' resentment to LED manufacturers with their documentation/claims. Most criticized them for not:
* Specifying when the LED was considered dead (efficiency loss)- This is a major factor in expectancy. A few manufacturers answered claiming at 50% luminance loss was the LED considered "dead". The results showed 50,000 20,000 hours *I misread*. It would appear life expectancy varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer, its apparent to sources that luminance loss percentage was going to vary.
* Specifying LED's used (White, red, etc)
* At least publishing documentation etc. So far no publication