RMS value of the square wave signal

Pixelx

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Messages
24
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
3
Activity points
253
As is the case with a square wave signal, without the RMS offset it is not dependent on the fill
And when there is an offset in the RMS signal, it depends on the fill.
How is it derived? There may even be integral calculus, but I would like to understand it in a simple and mathematical way, step by step.

for DC offset the formula works Vrms = Vmax * square root (duty).
for Ac it doesn't work
 

Attachments

  • 1 (1).jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 23
  • 2.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 24

The formula you wrote is valid only for rectangular waveform that goes from 0 to a given voltage. If you apply the AC coupling you will have a zero mean waveform going from -Vm/2 to Vm/2. From the definition of RMS (root mean square) you have to consider that the negative part folds on the positive y axis (that is -Vm/2 will go to a level Vm/2) then the result will be a constant voltage of amplitude Vm/2.
 

Thanks for the answer, what if there is such a chart for a different duty cycle?
DC DC converters regulate the duty cycle, so the RMS value of the voltage that goes to the transformer winding must change.
How to determine the RMS of such a waveform for different duty cycle?
 

Attachments

  • 11.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 23

Hi,

this is not a square wave (2 levels) but now you show a three level signal. Here one needs to now the timing.

For a square wave -4V / +4V levels (no 0V level)
--> the RMS always is 4V (independent of duty cycle)

But I don´t know how this refers to a transformer. Please explain.

Klaus
 

For waveforms with discrete voltage levels, integral calculus reduces to a simple square root of sum of squares.
--- Updated ---

E.g.

|V| = V1 for delta t = T1
|V| = V2 for delta t = T2

Vrms = sqrt((T1*V1² + T2*V2²)/(T1+T2))
 
Last edited:

I would like to understand it in a simple and mathematical way
At some time the definition of RMS for an arbitrary waveform was a way of answering the question "If DC can produce an identical heating effect on a resistor, what DC voltage do you apply?" Amid math and meter readings some consensus emerged as to the proper coefficients relating RMS to Average to AC to DC.

The more recent version of Falstad's animated interactive simulator can be commanded to tell these figures onscreen in edit windows or scope traces. Example, you can choose a sine wave readout in peak amplitude or RMS value, or both.
 

Vrms = sqrt((T1*V1² + T2*V2²)/(T1+T2))

referring to the picture of post#3:
I´d repalce (T1 + T2) with (Tperiod)

--> Vrms = sqrt((T1*V1² + T2*V2²)/(Tperiod))
Because it also includes the times where V = 0

Klaus
 
Reactions: FvM

Thank you for your answers.

I think I calculated something wrong and I don't get the exact Vrms results from the oscilloscope.
Could you substitute the values based on these screenshots to get what the oscilloscope shows?

How to calculate the voltage generated on the oscilloscope?
I will add that the RMS depends on the given half of the filling. If the upper rectangles are at 10% and the lower ones at 40%, the RMS is also different.
What is the formula to calculate this?
If you know how to derive this formula from integral form, it would be great.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 17

How to calculate the voltage generated on the oscilloscope?
--> see post#5 / post#7.

It´s on you to give the timing vlaues.
What is the formula to calculate this?
--> see post#5 / post#7.

You coulld use a calculator or something like eXcel.

Klaus
 

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…