Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Rise time and frequency scaling

Status
Not open for further replies.

tasctasc

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
40
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,589
Just wondering how rise time scales with technology now that the frequencies are held approximately constant with the move to multi-core? Intuitively the transistors should still be faster since L is smaller so the rise time should get smaller. However, if the clock frequency doesn't change and typically the rise time is designed to be ~10% of the clock frequency then are the transistors made intentionally slower? If so, is this done by using larger L's? Doesn't that at least partially defeat the purpose of the scaling?
 

Rise time is a function in both Ron of the transistor as well as CL

As the technology scales, the parasitic capacitance of the inverter (basic digital block for eg.) goes down.

**broken link removed**

However, the on-resistance does not scale on the same ladder....

RON = 1/(µnCOX W/L)(VGS − VT)

Combined ... you can adjust for the required tPHL and tPLH ... but in general ... the minimum value is always used to realize the digital blocks unless there is a fanout problem ... in analog design ... well .. it is another story = )

https://www.fairchildsemi.com/ms/MS/MS-556.pdf
 
Thank you AmrZohny for the information. Is the minimum value still always used for digital blocks in multi-core processors running at relatively slow frequencies?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top