ya may be there is a small change in capacitance but I think crossing a line could make a winding size a little bit more because a single wire crosses more times....
Yes it would make it marginally thicker. But for a given application, functionality might be more important than size.
These are very tiny factors, and also the winding machine design is some more complicated in both manual and automatic and there may be breakage of conductors while winding in jerky movements these are also can be considered..........
Sounds good, but only in theory. I presume the question is about general transformers, not special devices like RF transformers. For RF transformers, a number of special winding techniques is in use. Snellings "Soft ferrites" has a complete chapter about the "properties of windings" discussing this stuff.The interwinding voltage difference can become quite large with bottom-top/ top-bottom style. I.e. once you reach the bottom again, the p.d. between the windings at this point is the highest. However with bottom-top/ bottom-top this p.d. remains constant, and lesser than the max of the other method. This is important where high voltages & insulation is a concern.
Next, it has also been shown that the inter-layer capacitance charge is lesser with bottom-top/ bottom-top method. Leading to a better 'ideal' transformer.
Practical manufacturing issues & economic consideration of course must always be weighed when doing a complete design.
But it's not clear to me why there would be a jerky movement or breakage ? Surely a properly designed system would not do this ?
Two criteria are affected with the different styles of winding :
The interwinding voltage difference can become quite large with bottom-top/ top-bottom style. I.e. once you reach the bottom again, the p.d. between the windings at this point is the highest. However with bottom-top/ bottom-top this p.d. remains constant, and lesser than the max of the other method. This is important where high voltages & insulation is a concern.
Next, it has also been shown that the inter-layer capacitance charge is lesser with bottom-top/ bottom-top method. Leading to a better 'ideal' transformer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?