Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Regulating a shower heater coil by phase cutting?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cupoftea

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
3,058
Helped
62
Reputation
124
Reaction score
139
Trophy points
63
Activity points
15,956
Hi,
We wish to regulate mains power to a 500W shower heater coil (a resistor)...so we will use symetrical phase cut dimming.
It is leading and trailing edge dimming together, so as to improve mains harmonics to pass EN61000-3-2.

Is this common, or are heaters exempt from mains harmonics regulations?

Its only a little shower.....as it just is used to wash armpits and hair.

What about mains half cycle skipping for this application? (eg miss one mains half cycle in eight, or nine, say?)
 

full wave is by far the better method, 1,0,1 or 1,0,0,1,0,01 ... or 3,0,3,0,3, ... etc

No DC in the mains, super quiet as OFF & ON are at zero xing ....
 
Probably depends on whether "we" are making a product for
sale under said regulations, or just rigging a finer control than
a bang-bang thermostat in the privacy of one's garage. In the
latter case, nobody's business if you don't make it their
business.
 
Thanks, but that will cause visible flicker...and sorry i forgot to say,......its an IR heater, and that "missing" method causes visible flicker.....the light flicker cant be (cheaply) blocked from the customer, and thye wont like it.
 

Phase angle control isn't permitted for non-lighting applications. I don't get the purpose of using a filament IR lamp for water heating, in so far your flicker problem is purely self-induced.
 
Phase angle control isn't permitted for non-lighting applications
Thanks, though what about symmetrical phase angle control...which has much better mains harmonics?
--- Updated ---

full wave is by far the better method, 1,0,1 or 1,0,0,1,0,01 ... or 3,0,3,0,3, ... etc

No DC in the mains, super quiet as OFF & ON are at zero xing ....
Thanks, though we wonder about the flicker regulations, pertaining to this?
 
Last edited:

Thanks, though what about symmetrical phase angle control...which has much better mains harmonics?
Doesn't keep Class A harmonic current limits at lower power percent as far as I see. Check yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top