reactance of a capacitor & inductor

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dinesh401

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
104
Helped
3
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
BANGALORE
Visit site
Activity points
2,077
The reactance of a capacitor is indicated sometimes as Xc=1/j2pifc and sometimes as Xc=1/2pifc.
So what is the reason for this, which notation we have to follow during calculations.
and what is the difference between these two....?
 

The complex "j" operator implies that there is a phase-shift associated with the component (i.e., current and voltage in the device are out of phase). If you are just trying to calculate the resistive part of the complex impedance, you don't need the "j".
 

"as Xc=1/j2pifc and sometimes as Xc=1/2pifc." I have never seen it written this way before (even if its numerically correct) its written as :- -j 1/2PIfc, likewise the reactance of an inductor is +j 2PIfl. this is so during a calculation the + and - js can be subtracted or added leaving a single answer of + J.... or -j....
Frank
 

chuckey said:
I have never seen it written this way before (even if its numerically correct) its written as :- -j 1/2PIfc,
Click to expand...

Surprisingly - I have seen it written this way very often:

Xc=1/sC with s=jw=j*2Pi*f we get:

Xc=1/(jwC)=1/(j*2Pi*f*C).

Of course, now you can insert the identity j=-1/j .
 

The debatable point is wheter the formula sign Xc designates the imaginary impedance or a scalar value (measured in ohm).

At least some text books are using it in the latter meaning, e.g.

Code: 
Z = R + jXL - jXc
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…