shredder929
Junior Member level 3
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 27
- Helped
- 1
- Reputation
- 2
- Reaction score
- 2
- Trophy points
- 3
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Activity points
- 408
This example in Razavi's Microelectronics book seems to break KCL to me. If I_in goes up, by KCL it must increase the Id of M2 right? So Vx will go down, and Vout goes up, and Id of M1 goes down as well, which makes sense because Vx went down.
But what the text states is I_in goes up and Id of M2 goes down. How is that possible? M1 has an infinite input impedance, where is that extra current going? When I try and simulate in SPICE it makes even less sense, neither of the transistors turns on.
But what the text states is I_in goes up and Id of M2 goes down. How is that possible? M1 has an infinite input impedance, where is that extra current going? When I try and simulate in SPICE it makes even less sense, neither of the transistors turns on.