I am attaching the PDF of the schematic. Please let me know how to obtain the desired operation as mentioned in post 1. Also how do we attach LTSPICE simulation?maybe its just me
the bottom of your schematic, below the values of R20 and R21 is black.
please resend schematic
I have updated the circuit by removing the non-standard parts. Kindly let me know how complementary turn is achieved in Green and RT1 LEDThanks FvM for the reply. Can you let me know the circuit's functionality, you may substituting the missing element with alternate.
Here is a RAR utility, attached.My pc cannot open a RAR file that has not been seen for many years.
Can somebody please open and convert it to a normal schematic (PNG)?
RAR and any other compressed file is easily opened with free https://www.7-zip.org/My pc cannot open a RAR file that has not been seen for many years.
Can somebody please open and convert it to a normal schematic (PNG)?
Your design requires too many fixes and is overly complicated.Thanks FvM for the reply. Can you let me know the circuit's functionality, you may substituting the missing element with alternate.
--- Updated ---
I have updated the circuit by removing the non-standard parts. Kindly let me know how complementary turn is achieved in Green and RT1 LED
Thanks Tony for the reply,RAR and any other compressed file is easily opened with free https://www.7-zip.org/
Then with PTspice installed I opened the .asc file and ^prtsrcn pasted here ^V
View attachment 178617
I see a ground Opto base as a problem.... open that then use 10k pull up to +v instead so that it uses less current than diode. Beta = 0.25 to 0.5
AG you owe me a coffee
--- Updated ---
Your design requires too many fixes and is overly complicated.
Did you not understand my simple solution is complementary?
If this does not do what you need, define all input outputs explicitly with tolerances and a timing diagram.
What is the contribution of the post to resolving the issue.My very old pc opened RAR files in Windows 3.1 (remember dial-up?).
Thanks d123 for the reply. Your simulation have give new insights to the issue.Hi sabu31,
It took me a while to reply as I wasn't sure of what the LEDs had to do, now I think I understand. Only PNPs was a terrible experience, It just made getting Always A on except when B is on and neither A nor B when C is on convoluted and problematic, adding a couple of NPNs makes the circuit much easier to make work as intended, so my version is three PNPs and three NPNs. It's not great, only a simulation, only tested at 27ºC, component values are rule-of-thumb, but maybe you can adapt the attached schematic to the circuit you have for: LED1 is on all the time, unless LED2 turns on (then LED1 turns off) and if LED3 turns on then LED 1 and LED2 must be off. I understand the third LED has the NPN with it that turns LED1 and LED2 off if input signal 2 is high, or actually the purpose is that the NPN is used as feedback to modulate a real sine wave input at its base and control how much current flows through LED1 and/or LED2 and therefore through the optotriac LED and control the current to a load represented by that resistor shorting the opto output device in the schematic Tony posted? I tested VG1 as a sine wave and then VG2 as a sine wave and the LED1 and LED2 still operate the same and are subserviant to/controlled by LED3 (input signal 2). It's a rough idea and not exhaustively tested.
View attachment 178675
If all you need is a digital/logic circuit that prioritizes input signals, this is a nice, simple circuit and you can extend it theoretically forever as each stage is only controlled by the preceding parallel stage (and the sum of signals that were fed into that) its own signal and an enable signal, not by a series stage that might lead to fan-out style-limitations:
View attachment 178676
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?