Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Process Design Kit (PDK) development for particular technology

Status
Not open for further replies.

frasheed

Junior Member level 1
Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Messages
15
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
189
Hello,

I have recently started to develop PDK for our own technology, It is currently in research phase and we do not have much information about technology parameters. My task is to develop PDK. I know there is a FreePDK available that I could use as a base PDK. But, I am planning to start everything from scratch (because it is not CMOS technology). I have already written the basic technology file (*.tf) using DEFT and also the display.drf. Now I am moving towards pCell development. I have some experience with CAD tools and programming (C,perl, SKILL). My question is how hard would it be to make a develop whole PDK flow (Schematic, layout, simulation, DRC, LVS, extraction) for our own technology.

Secondly, I have heard about this Open-Acess PDK's but haven't worked with them. Should I focus open-access based PDK development ?. After developing whole PDK would it be difficult to convert it to open-access based PDK?. Any good guides related to Open-Access PDK development
 

can't help with the open access question. it seems to be a trend these days but not all PDKs adhere to it.

for schematic and layout you should make your PDK compatible with cadence. they own this share of the market and drive it the way they see fit. for simulation you can go with hspice or spectre. both are similar.

you should, at this point, think really hard about characterization. this affects DRC and LVS choices. there are only 2/3 tools that are used in industry, and you will have to most likely pick just one and support it all the way. calibre is the industry gold standard. I would start there, and see how easy it is to interface with calibre.
 
Thanks!
I am confused at the characterization part. How it would effect the DRC LVS tool choice ? Could you please describe briefly!
 

Thanks!
I am confused at the characterization part. How it would effect the DRC LVS tool choice ? Could you please describe briefly!

You can only run characterization (extraction) on a database that passes DRC and LVS. Ideally you want the same tool or toolchain to do all 3.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top