ambreesh
Full Member level 5
Hi,
If any of you have read the following paper, please help.
Power supply rejection ratio in operational transconductance amplifiers
Willy Sansen and M S J Steyaert IEEE transaction on circuit and systems Sept 1990
The sign convention is not clear for e.g eq6 and eq7 similarly for eq9 , observe the sign for (go5+scp5) .
I feel that explanation for PSRR for "The source coupled input satge with active load" is not as per the procedure defined in the paper. If I do not understand it could one of you please help.
The paper is already uploaded in Request for IEEE papers forum
If any of you have read the following paper, please help.
Power supply rejection ratio in operational transconductance amplifiers
Willy Sansen and M S J Steyaert IEEE transaction on circuit and systems Sept 1990
The sign convention is not clear for e.g eq6 and eq7 similarly for eq9 , observe the sign for (go5+scp5) .
I feel that explanation for PSRR for "The source coupled input satge with active load" is not as per the procedure defined in the paper. If I do not understand it could one of you please help.
The paper is already uploaded in Request for IEEE papers forum