When you apply load to a secondary, its effect is to try to LOWER the flux in the core, lowering the back EMF generated in the primary winding and causing more current to flow in the primary as more voltage appears across the primary winding resistance.
So yes, you can prove such a thing. For an ideal transformer the flux in the core is proportional to the sum of the products of the turns and the currents in each winding, and the back EMF is proportional to the flux * number of turns.
Assuming equal numbers of turns and eliding some annoying constants (Because electromagnetism was a lot of years ago, and I cannot remember the appropriate magic):
So: Flux is proportional to Iprim - Isec1 - Isec2.
V is proportional to flux.
Hence with a constant voltage applied to the primary, Iprim must equal the sum of the secondary currents, as the applied voltage is constant implying constant core flux.
Obviously real transformers have resistance and iron losses, as well as all sorts of other infelicities, any good EM text book will go into details of the maths.
Regards, Dan.