Rather than jump into this complicated schematic right away, try a basic approach. Read (a) the supply voltage waveform, and read (b) voltage waveform across R3. Compare them simultaneously. This ought to be a successful method to see several degrees of current lag in your setup. That is, power factor.
Add components to your bare schematic, one at a time. The 741 ought to have a dual supply, for the reason that the single supply results in its output staying above 2V, which is not reliable to appear as a 'low' to your 4093.
A current controlled current source models an ideal current xformer, so you can use it for the time being. Besides, how do you think the current xformer SPICE model looks inside ? ;-)I'm going to see if I can find a current transformer on multisim because the only thing that I found was a Current Controller Source but I guess that is not the transformer.
Rather than jump into this complicated schematic right away, try a basic approach. Read (a) the supply voltage waveform, and read (b) voltage waveform across R3. Compare them simultaneously. This ought to be a successful method to see several degrees of current lag in your setup. That is, power factor.
Add components to your bare schematic, one at a time. The 741 ought to have a dual supply, for the reason that the single supply results in its output staying above 2V, which is not reliable to appear as a 'low' to your 4093.
A current controlled current source models an ideal current xformer, so you can use it for the time being. Besides, how do you think the current xformer SPICE model looks inside ? ;-)
As for the non-functional "Design 1" circuit with current transformer, the problem is that you didn't hear. It's been said that a current transformer must be operated with the lower winding side as primary and a shunt resistor on the secondary, so that the primary voltage drop is minimized.
The simulator doesn't complain, but a real OP would be destroyed by feeding +/- 25V to the input.
Means, you don't know how to describe a transformer in SPICE? An ideal linear transformer is modelled by coupled inductors with k=1, inductance ratio is the squared windings ratio. For 2000:1 current transformer e.g. Lprim = 100 µH, Lsec = 400 HThe problem is that I cannot model it on the multisim.
The other way around, I think.For 2000:1 current transformer e.g. Lprim = 100 µH, Lsec = 400 H
No, just as written. 2000:1 current transformer has 1:2000 voltage ratio, respectively 1:2000² inductance ratio, as described by KlausST.The other way around, I think.
If you want the phase shift, take the outputs of the NAND gates or comparators and pass them to a XOR gate. Look at the output of the XOR gate.If there is any advices of how to improve the circuit is welcome.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?