posting the synthesis report

Status
Not open for further replies.

kannan2590

Member level 4
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
77
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
india
Visit site
Activity points
2,321
some of the warning messages i am posting to you As i am not able to understand please help me to understand these messages.

Optimizing unit <polyphase2> ...
WARNING:Xst:1710 - FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_0> (without init value) has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1710 - FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_0> (without init value) has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_3> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_0> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_3> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_0> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_5> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.
WARNING:Xst:1896 - Due to other FF/Latch trimming, FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_5> has a constant value of 0 in block <iqmap1>.

Mapping all equations...
Building and optimizing final netlist ...
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/qfiltout_27> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 4 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/qfiltout_26> <filtering1/qfiltout_25> <filtering1/qfiltout_24> <filtering1/qfiltout_23>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_5> <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_2>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/ifiltout_27> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 4 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/ifiltout_26> <filtering/ifiltout_25> <filtering/ifiltout_24> <filtering/ifiltout_23>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_1> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following FF/Latch, which will be removed : <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_1>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_4> <Inst_upsample1/IMAP_UP_3>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_4> <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_3>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_5> <Inst_upsample1/QMAP_UP_2>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_7> <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_9>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_5> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_8> <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_10>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_5> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_8> <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_10>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_4> <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_3>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt03/MCM04_4> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following FF/Latch, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_4>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_5> <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_2>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_5> <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_2>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_7> <filtering1/subfilt03/MCM04_9>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_1> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following FF/Latch, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_1>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_4> <filtering1/subfilt01/dff1/qt1_3>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_6> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following FF/Latch, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_6>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_10> <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_12>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_8> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_9> <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_11>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_7> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_10> <filtering1/subfilt030/MCM59_12>
INFO:Xst:2261 - The FF/Latch <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_8> in Unit <iqmap1> is equivalent to the following 2 FFs/Latches, which will be removed : <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_9> <filtering/subfilt030/MCM59_11>


From these messages can you please tell me whether it is a coding problem if it is give some suggestions.
 

I thought they were pretty self explanitory. Some signals are stuck at 0, so its removing a load of registers. It will be a coding issue.
 

I thought they were pretty self explanitory. Some signals are stuck at 0, so its removing a load of registers. It will be a coding issue.

If it is a coding issue can you please give some suggestions .Whether there has to be any major change to be made in the code.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…