Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Pin type options in Cadence Virtuoso

Status
Not open for further replies.

Junus2012

Advanced Member level 5
Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
1,552
Helped
47
Reputation
98
Reaction score
53
Trophy points
1,328
Location
Italy
Activity points
15,235
Hello,

I have a question about the options for creating pins in Cadence virtuoso, there are many types to select, for example, power, ground, signal, clock ..etc.

Do they have physical meaning during the circuit simulation or real chip fabrication after exporting the gds file?

I have realized lately that I am using "signal" type even for creating the vdd! and the gnd! global and the clock pins in my design.



Thank you

Regar
 

I only use the basic library ipin (schipin), opin, iopin. These
come with some SRC rules associated (open input, shorted output,
etc.) and I imagine there may be other schematic constraints
applied to these others.

I generally make everything "iopin" to avoid most of that meddling.
But I do 90% analog, and the digital, "analog style"....
 
I wish there would be "?" button next to each entry / term / concept that would provide an immediate quick help to the user (especially - to a novice or infrequent user), in all EDA (and non-EDA) software tools - about its meaning, purpose, significance, implications, options, etc.

In a post-layout netlist (DSPF, SPEF, etc.), each port and instance pin has a description (single letter) explaining its purpose - I (input), O (output), B (bi-directional), maybe more.
Like many other things in a DSPF file, these entries have mono effect on electrical simulation.
They are used as annotations, to pass the design intent to downstream tools - so that their behavior, handling of the nets, pins, etc. is affected by the design intent.

Passing the design intent through the design flow is a very good thing, but in many occasions - it is not done, which is very bad.
People and tools have to spend extra efforts to "understand" what was the intent and needs to be done, and very often do much more than needed.
 
have a question about the options for creating pins in Cadence virtuoso, there are many types to select, for example, power, ground, signal, clock ..etc.

Do they have physical meaning during the circuit simulation or real chip fabrication after exporting the gds file?

I have realized lately that I am using "signal" type even for creating the vdd! and the gnd! global and the clock pins in my design.
Dear Junus2012,

If you happen to have the "Senan" handle on the Cadence Forums, I believe you asked this same question on the Cadence Forums. This is the question from the Cadence Forums:

"I have a question about the options for creating pins in Cadence virtuoso, there are many types to select, for example, power, ground, signal, clock ..etc.

Do they have physical meaning during the circuit simulation or real chip fabrication after exporting the gds file?

I have realized lately that I am using "signal" type even for creating the vdd! and the gnd! global and the clock pins in my design."

Andrew and I responded at URL:


Was our answer insufficient for your needs?

Shawn
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top