Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Pads design of new pcb library

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vraj

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
119
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
18
Activity points
1,038
Hi,

I am making new pcb library.

Is C1 and C2 are really necessary for pads design?

If I made square pads, then would it cause problem for reflow soldering?

Thanks

- - - Updated - - -

NipR3bf.png
 

No, having a chamfer on the corners of the IC does not mean you have to do that to the pads.
Plain rectangular pads work fine, bullet shape pads work fine.
Square pads? I'd do them rectangular not square.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vraj

    Vraj

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Yes, rectangular pads *
 

Make a rectangular pad at least L x b for each pad. A better pad would be L + 0.004" by b + 0.004", with the resist opening L x b. You can radius the inside part of the pad if you desire, but it is not necessary. With modern PCB tools, you can make any geometry pad that you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vraj

    Vraj

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
If I made square pads, then would it cause problem for reflow soldering?

The drawing that is presented in the datasheet is not always the recommended dimensions for the footprint, but often represent the dimensions of the component itself, therefore you should extend a little the land patterns on this case. Consider the fact that according to current standards, for the same component it is possible to draw slightly different footprints optimized for distinct assembling processes, or rather, the same footprint with varying margins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vraj

    Vraj

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hi,

question3.png

This is AV connector( RCA Jack).

Problem is height.

The top side of this around 13.2mm from the pcb.

My plastic model will be made of PLA or ABS material having 1.5mm thickness.

So, total height is 13.2+1.5=14.7mm from pcb.

My switch is having 14mm height from pcb.

question2.pngquestion2.png

So, should I reduce the thickness of model and/or I reduce height by doing this:question3.png?

I will push Av connector little outside of pcb so that the block will on outside of pcb.
Will this cause any problem?
I will change pcb hole only size for av connector.

I found I can reduce size by 1.4mm (by scaling image and measuring distance).

Switch head will 0.8mm from case[14-(13.1+1.5-1.4)]=0.8mm.

Is it good enough distance for pushing switch ?

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Hi,

From my experience: doing non standard assembling (of your RCA jack) is likely to prduce problems.

Therefore I recommend to keep on standards.
* use a different RCA jack or use a different push button

Check if there is an improvement when the RCA jack and push button are be mounted on opposite sides of the PCB.

Klaus
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vraj

    Vraj

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top