Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I think Philips USB transceiver(HS or FS) is best because power consumption is low. You can check Philips website. They developed USB series products in singapore.
As far as USB transiver is concerned, Philips USB transciver is the best. There are a wide range family of USB transcivers: 1.0, 2.0, OTG UTMI interface. But, if you are only interested with USB device or USB host ICs, Cpress is the best choice. They are easy to use for many kinds of application.
I don't think there is any difference between USB 2.0 UTMI transceiver and OTG 2.0 transceiver. The differences are mainly in the link layer of these standards not the transceivers. The same is true for USB 1.1.
(to last response). actually there are differences at the transceiver level
besides the ones at the link layer. companies also cheat and clain to be
usb2.0 compliant even though they don't support the 480Mb speed.
this is what i know, please correct if wrong :
- a few companies have or are about to have usb2.0 otg at 12Mb speed
(cypress,philips,micrel,others)
- none realy has or is about to have a usb2.0 otg transceiver at 480Mb speed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
