Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Oscillators for FM radio

Chiranka K

Junior Member level 3
Junior Member level 3
Joined
Mar 19, 2024
Messages
28
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
207
I was building a radio receiver for FM waves (87.5-108MHz), I want to build every block on my own (oscillators, mixers, demodulators) and then put them together. I was designing a oscillator, and came across 2 options
1. Colpitts
colpitts.png

2. Clapp
Clapp.png


I had a few doubts
1. Which of these two performs better?
2. What range of frequency should my LO be able to give?
3. What IF frequency to use (I did my research and most of them show 10.7Mhz).
4. while running a simulation of this on LtSpice, what component should I use for RFC, and what BJT should I use?

Finally, do u think I should be building a receiver for AM or for FM as my first radio receiver?

Thank you.
Chiranka K
 
1)




2) Thats receiver design and band targeted driven selection.

3) 10.7, because of component availability. But if doing LF or HF many receivers use
100Khz or 50 Khz or 455 Khz. Amateur Radio Handbook many discussions on receiver
design.


4) BJT selection, low noise, fT of roughly 10X frequency of interest. Chokes -



Regards, Dana.
 
1)




2) Thats receiver design and band targeted driven selection.

3) 10.7, because of component availability. But if doing LF or HF many receivers use
100Khz or 50 Khz or 455 Khz. Amateur Radio Handbook many discussions on receiver
design.


4) BJT selection, low noise, fT of roughly 10X frequency of interest. Chokes -



Regards, Dana.
Thanks Dana,
Do you think my first radio project should be targeting FM band or AM band?
 
Usually Clapp oscillators have better frequency stability than Colpitts oscillators, due to series configuration of the LC resonator.
In the schematic attached if vary C1 between 15pF and 36pF you get a 88MHz to 108MHz signal. C1 could be replaced by a varactor.
 

Attachments

  • Clapp_88MHz-108MHz.jpg
    Clapp_88MHz-108MHz.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 18
Usually Clapp oscillators have better frequency stability than Colpitts oscillators, due to series configuration of the LC resonator.
In the schematic attached if vary C1 between 15pF and 36pF you get a 88MHz to 108MHz signal. C1 could be replaced by a varactor.
Is Q2 here used just to get a better gain?
 
In the Clapp oscillator in #1, the resonator components (Lt and Ct) are also in series.

doubt_1.png


I did a simulation and got a wave form similar to this, i can tune C7 from 12p to 18p to get my desired freqeuncy range.
However the waves are not pure sine, will it have any problem in mixing stage and on the overall receiver?
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top