Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

OpenTCP port to 8052 and to M16C for download

Status
Not open for further replies.

dainis

Advanced Member level 4
Advanced Member level 4
Joined
May 15, 2001
Messages
1,125
Helped
53
Reputation
106
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,318
Activity points
9,269
25.02.2003
OpenTCP_8252-1.0.1.src.zip - Preliminary OpenTCP port to 8052. Thanks to Alexey Selischev for this contribution. Changes and modifications will be incorporated to main OpenTCP sources.

h**p://w*w.opentcp.org/download/OpenTCP_8252-1.0.1.src.zip

And
OpenTCP_M16C-1.0.1.src.zip - Preliminary OpenTCP port to M16C. Thanks to Chris Brandt from Mitsubishi for this contribution. These sources also contain driver for Cirrus Logic's CS8900 Ethernet controller.
h**p://w*w.opentcp.org/download/OpenTCP_M16C-1.0.1.src.zip
 

opentcp_8252-1.0.1.src.zip

I've tried to rebuild "...\demo\demo-8252.Uv2" project, many errors found.

I didn't modified anything of the package "OpenTCP_8252-1.0.1.src.zip",
just unzip and open the "demo" project, then rebuild.

What I do wrong?

Regards,
 

projet uv2 8052

This is preliminary OpenTCP port to 8052 .... :(
Maybe other compiller version or settings ....
 

opentcp download

OpenTCP 1.0.4
new ports:
h**p://www.embedded-electronics.nm.ru/files/opentcp-1-0-4/
for K*il 7.x users:
h**p://embedded0.nm.ru

please check the project's settings for include path and defines before rebuild
 

opentcp ppp

also a new port for free compiler SDCC and at89s8252 is available
**broken link removed**

Is it necessary to make ports to other processors? Or it is better to realize PPP in OpenTCP?
 

8052 port

hi,
pin said:
Is it necessary to make ports to other processors? Or it is better to realize PPP in OpenTCP?
thank you for your effort, i prefer to see PPP materialization....
(IMHO)
GoodLuck!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top