Exactly.Tom-nor said:Something likes this you had in mind?
With a 356 type opAmp this cannot work, because a voltage range of 0 ... 3V doesn't lie within the input common voltage range of these amplifiers. You should use a GND-input-capable opAmp like the LM324 / LM2902 . If you use a different type, look for a specification saying "Input common-mode voltage range includes ground".Tom-nor said:when i simulate this, the center point is around 2.8 volts. which is a bit high, and i cant
No, this means the input common voltage range goes down even to -0.3V, which means it can accept input voltages up to -300mV and still works well.Tom-nor said:checked out the datasheet for LM324 / LM2902, but i think theres an issue with the input voltage range. its says that -0.3 volts on the input is as low as it goes before the output goes to V+.
Would be ok for both DC and AC. But you wanted to bias the input with 1 volt, that's how I designed the feedback network.Tom-nor said:Does that go for an AC signal?, or is it -0.3 dc ?
Sure, but you insert it via AC coupling (the 10nF cap), hence no DC part will be transferred to the opAmp.Tom-nor said:And my input signal is as mentioned about +- 300mv.
What are the DC voltages at the inputs and on the output of the LM324 ? Do they show the voltages which I indicated?Tom-nor said:So my simulation is still not working as expected, so i raised the input pulse signal im using to -200 mv to 400 mv and still not working.
Could you post your schematic with the DC bias voltages, and perhaps your simulation schematic?Tom-nor said:So not sure if its the opamp, or if im doing something else wrong. Maby a pulse generator isent they way to go when i simmulate.
Sorry, Tom,Tom-nor said:Maby i missunderstood then concept of biasing, and that i need to add some more to my circuit?
If you find a single supply (or a rail-to-rail) opAmp (input common mode range includes 0 Volt = GND is necessary!) with either jFET or MOSFET inputs, you may increase R5 two orders of magnitude (1GΩ) if this should be necessary for your input source.Tom-nor said:Its abit hard to find a suitable one that runs on singlesupply tho, but gna look into it.
Tom-nor said:Think i can use this circuit (follower), if i can find a suitable opamp.
Singly suply. and very high input impendance.
The 324 opamp works well when i use resistors 20k and 220k, but i need to able to use way larger resistors. 2M and 22M or even higher.
Its abit hard to find a suitable one that runs on singlesupply tho, but gna look into it.
Not sure if this is the easiest way to do it tho.
what do you think?
thnx for taking the time to assist me on this!
Yes, this one is well appropriate for R5=1GΩ, however not for a supply voltage of 12V, because its power supply voltage is limited to 8V. I'd recommend to supply it with 5V (and then reduce R4 to 47kΩ).adinogcas said:Checkout the TLV2262 from TI, it works for both single supply, rail to rail and I think you can request free samples from TI...
You can quite well compensate the input bias current influence by inserting another resistor with the same value (10Meg) between the feedback node and the inverting input.Tom-nor said:the input bias current is typ 45nA. 45nA * 10Meg = 0.45 V of extra input.
This was with gain = 1 + R2/R1 = 2 , not 1 !Tom-nor said:So i tried with the 10Meg resistor again, but switched the feedback gain from 3.3 to 1. ... With the feedback gain = 1 it looks ok.
Sure; that's why I designed the input bias to be 1.4V/4.3 ≈ 325mV . 12V * 3.3k/123.3k = 321mV .Tom-nor said:Wont the 1 V input bias be amplified with a factor of 3.3 aswell??
Don't panic ;-) Your input RC time constant is 1e7 * 1e-8 = 100ms. It takes about 3 time constants to load the 10nF to ≈90% of its final operating point, a very long time for your simulation (unless you put the correct initial value on your cap, resp. on the inp node), but nothing in reality ;-)Tom-nor said:Ok, here is the same simulations with the tlv2262, looks abit better
And i should add to the simulations before, the opamp settles at more expected values after a short time. Say i put start time 50ms and end time 60ms, instead of 0 and 10ms. The output is completely different.
So that kinda got me fooled abit, so not sure how everything is gna work when i make a prototyp.
Good decision!Tom-nor said:But im going for the lmv2262 due to its mosfet input.
Then you can adjust your quiescent output voltage.Tom-nor said:And i think your recomendation of a potmeter instead of the 3.3 k omh resistor is a very good idea.
I'd suggest to block with 2 diodes against 0V and 2.8V . A 3V zener has a rather soft breakdown voltage - unlike >5V diodes, which also are called zeners, but in reality are avalanche diodes, thus show a steep breakdown behaviour. A 3V zener surely would ruin the accuracy of the upper voltage range.Tom-nor said:So gna try to get the opamp ordered, and start working on blocking negativ voltage and voltage over 2.8V after the opamp output. Dont wanna kill my adc Smile
If i remember correctly, you can block negative voltages with a diode, and block the voltages higher than 2.8 V with a zener?
You could do that, but not necessarily so. I'd recommend to use the same power supply as your ADC (or the µP which contains the ADC). For the overvoltage protection pls. s. below.Tom-nor said:About the ADC protection, i figured i will supply the oppamp with 3.3 volts or smth to deny any higher output.
A rather bad solution: this will deteriorate the accuracy of your signal resolution.Tom-nor said:And about blocking the negative voltage, if i put a diode in series with the opamp output, and increase the bias with 0.35 ( 0.7 volts extra after amplification)
How will that affect my signal at the ADC input?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?